The Little Review, March 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 1) — John Shaqi
The Little Review, March 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 1)Various
General
The Little Review, March 1914 (Vol. 1, No. 1)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
MARGARET C. ANDERSON
_Succession_: A Comedy of the Generations, by Ethel Sidgwick.
(Small, Maynard and Company, Boston.)
Ethel Sidgwick is the world's next great woman novelist. Though I
confess eagerly that I enjoy her novels more than any novels I've ever
read--I mean it literally--it isn't on so personal a basis that I offer
the judgment. But I'm confident that within ten years the critical
perspective will show her on this pinnacle. Since George Eliot and the
Brontës, I can think of no woman who has focused art and life so
intensely into novel writing--though even as I say this _Ethan Frome_
looms up and leaves me a little uncomfortable. But the important thing
is that Ethel Sidgwick is going to count--enormously.
People who aren't yet aware of her (and there seem to be a lot of them)
can be easily explained as that body of the public that neglects a
masterpiece until it has become the fashion to acclaim it. But Ethel
Sidgwick has written a novel that's more important than any number of
our traditional masterpieces. For instance, it's a much more important
story than _Vanity Fair_; just as _Jean Christophe_ is more valuable
than _Ivanhoe_. The novel of manners has its delightful place, and so
has the historical romance; but the novel that chronicles with subtlety
the intellectual or artistic temper of an age is as much more important
than these as Greek drama is than the moving picture show.
I know there are people who'll read _Succession_ and continue to prefer
Thackeray's geniality to Miss Sidgwick's brilliant seriousness and her
humor that's not at all genial--but rapid, sophisticated, impatient of
comedy in the accepted sense. Ethel Sidgwick might write a radiant
tragedy, or a wistful satire, or a sad comedy; I can never imagine her
being anything so obvious as merely comic--or genial! She doesn't laugh;
she _couldn't_ chuckle; she has just the flash of a smile, and then she
hurries on dazzlingly, as though things were too important to be
anything but passionate about. She doesn't "warm the cockles of your
heart"--or whatever that silly phrase is; and she doesn't do crude, raw
things to show you that she "knows life." She goes down into the
darkness rose-crowned, in Rupert Brooke's gorgeous phrase; when she goes
into the sunlight it is always with something of remembered agony.
That's the fine quality of her vitalism. She's too strong to be hard,
too steel-like to be robust. She's like fire and keen air--to borrow
another poet's phrase. She reflects life through the mirror of a vivid
personality--which is one way of being an important artist. She assumes
that you're also vivid, and quick, and subtle, and this gives her
writing the most beautiful quality of nervousness--the kind you mean
when you're not talking about nerves. In short, Ethel Sidgwick is the
most definitely magnetic personality I've ever felt through a book's
pages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account