The Little Review, May 1914 (Vol. 1., No. 3)Various
General
The Little Review, May 1914 (Vol. 1., No. 3)
Various
Literature, Modern -- 20th century -- Periodicals
Trusty, dusky, vivid, true,
With eyes of gold and bramble-dew;
Steel-true and blade straight,
The great artificer made my mate.
"Steel-true" and "blade straight" are epithets more often applied to
men; and indeed Mr. McClure, in speaking of Mrs. Stevenson in his
memoirs, says: "She had many of the fine qualities that are usually
attributed to men rather than women: a fair-mindedness, a large
judgment, a robust, inconsequential philosophy of life."
How then, if in seeking an ideal education for girls, we should dismiss,
or at least diminish, the importance of a purely utilitarian aspect and
look for something that will eventually ensure such qualities?
If, as the feminists urge, they are trying to raise men to a higher
plane, why not apply a little of this passion for uplift to the
education of women into nobler, higher attitudes? Steel-true, and blade
straight! I like the sound of that.
This education of the girl is getting to be an obsession with me.
Everything I read resolves itself into terms of girl-psychology. A
ridiculous tale, not long ago, appeared in The Saturday Evening Post,
called Letting George Do It. George, in charge of the kitchen for a few
weeks or days, immediately revolutionized everything; shortened and
lightened labor, invented all sorts of labor-saving devices, etc., etc.
Immediately all men say, derisively: "Well, that's exactly what a man
would do. You boast that women are as good as men. Why haven't they,
years ago, done all these things for themselves?" It seemed
unanswerable. I have heard housekeepers, bright women, too, speak with
exasperation of the foolish story, while helplessly admitting its truth.
But I really think I've stalked the beast to its lair. Granted it is
true, but have men spent their lives for centuries in a narrow round of
domestic drudgery? Women have, and with very little intellectual
diversion, besides, their society limited to other domestic drudges, and
to their own husbands, who don't try to broaden them unless they are
exceptional men. And if men had lived such lives would they have
blithely introduced these reforms just because their masculinity makes
them so superior to women that they would develop, even under adverse
conditions? They wouldn't stay drudges, they claim. Well, we won't
either, so George is not so smart as he thinks he is!
GERMAN-AMERICANS AND AMERICANS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account