If the freethinkers firmly believe that in them dwell the hope for a
better humanity, for an exhilarated progress, for universal freedom and
liberty for all mankind, and emancipation from fear and superstition,
then they, too, must destroy. They must first undo the wrong before they
can proceed to build on a right foundation.
They must build on the corner stone that all religion is human in its
origin, erroneous in its theories, and ridiculous in its threats and
rewards. Religion is the greatest impediment to the progress of human
happiness.
CHAPTER IV
SOUNDNESS OF A FOUNDATION FOR A BELIEF IN A DEITY
_It is better to bury a delusion and forget it than to insult its
memory by retaining the name when the thing has perished_.
F. H. BRADLEY.
_A thousand miraculous happenings have been honoured by the
testimony of the ancients, which in later times under a more
exacting and sceptical scrutiny can no longer be believed. Inherent
in man's nature is his disposition to be gulled.... Emotion is
encouraged to supplant cool reason, fanaticism to supplant
tolerance. Not by such means can our race be saved_.
LLEWELYN POWYS.
Our interplanetary visitor is firmly convinced that all religion, no
matter what its antiquity or its modernity may be, is an invention of
our groping earthly minds. It occurs to him that it would be interesting
and proper to lay aside all theology, all creed, all the superficial
trappings placed by man about his conceptions of a deity, and consider
only the basic God-idea. The literature on the subject revealed to him
that even on this broad and basic principle not all religionists were
agreed. He found a threefold classification:
(1) Those who held to the belief in an anthropomorphic personal God who
was benevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent.
(2) Those who saw in the constitution of our universe an impersonal
Supreme Power, who had created the universe, but who had not given us
any revelation, and thus has no need for worship by prayer and
sacrifice.
(3) Those who very recently conceived of the deity as a "cosmic force,"
an "ultimate," or as a mathematical or physical law. Such are the
hypotheses of Jeans and Eddington. The Martian set about, therefore,
with the principle that, "God is a hypothesis, and as such, stands in
need of proof."
(1) The belief in a personal God:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account