who, following his example, have searched for a rule of life and the
principles of conduct in the knowledge of nature. For, after all,
Tournebroche, my son, what is knowledge of nature if it be not a
fantasy of the senses? And what does science add to it, I ask you,
with its savants, from the time of Gassendi, who was no donkey, and
Descartes and his disciples, down to that precious fool, Monsieur de
Fontenelle? Large spectacles, my son, spectacles like those which sit
on my nose. All the microscopes and telescopes which we make a show
of, what are they but glasses a little clearer than these of mine, that
I bought last year at the fair of St. Laurence, of which the glass
for the left eye, the one I see the best with, was unhappily cracked
this winter by a footstool flung at my head by the lame cutler, who
fancied I was kissing Catherine the lace-maker, for he is a coarse
man, and utterly obfuscated by his visions of carnal desires. Yes,
Tournebroche, my son, what are these instruments with which the savants
and the curious fill their galleries and their cabinets? What are
spectacles, astrolabes, compasses, if not the means of helping the
senses to keep their illusions, and to multiply our fatal ignorance
of nature while we multiply our relations with her? The most learned
among us differ merely from the ignorant by the faculty they acquire
of amusing themselves with manifold and complicated errors. They see
the world in a faceted topaz, instead of seeing it as does Madame, your
mother, for instance, with the naked eye the good God has given her.
But they do not alter their eyes in donning spectacles; they do not
alter dimensions in using apparatus proper to the measurement of space;
they do not alter the weight of things in using very sensitive scales.
They discover new appearances merely, and are but the plaything
of new illusions. That is all! If I were not convinced, my son, of
the holy truths of our religion, there would be left to me in this
conviction, which I hold, that all human knowledge is but a progress
in phantasmagoria, nothing but to throw myself from this parapet into
the Seine, which has seen many others drown since she began to flow, or
to go and ask of Catherine that form of oblivion from the ills of this
world which one finds in her arms, and for which it would be indecent
for me to look, in my position, and above all, at my age. I should not
know what to believe in the midst of all this apparatus, whose powerful
deceptions would increase immeasurably the falsehood of my outlook and
I should be an entirely miserable academician.”
My good master was talking in this fashion before the first recess
to the left, counting from the Rue Dauphine, and he was beginning to
frighten the dealer who took him for an exorcist, when he suddenly
picked up an old geometry, illustrated with sufficiently bad cuts by
Sebastien Leclerc.[7]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account