The Roman hat mystery : $b A problem in deductionQueen, Ellery
General
The Roman hat mystery : $b A problem in deduction
Queen, Ellery
Detective and mystery stories; Fathers and sons -- Fiction; Novelists -- Fiction; Police -- New York (State) -- New York -- Fiction
“The two exceptions I noted a moment ago are the two doors on the
extreme left aisle, which should have been guarded but were not because
the usherette, Madge O’Connell, was sitting in the audience next to
her lover. This presented to my mind the possibility that the murderer
might have left by one of these two doors, which were conveniently
placed for an escape should the murderer have been so inclined.
However, even this possibility was eliminated by the statement of the
O’Connell girl, whom I hunted up after she was questioned by dad.”
“You talked to her on the sly, did you, you scalawag?” roared Queen,
glaring at Ellery.
“I certainly did,” chuckled Ellery, “and I discovered the one
important fact that seems pertinent to this phase of the investigation.
O’Connell swore that before she left the doors to sit down next to
Parson Johnny she stepped on the inside floor-lock that latches them
top and bottom. When the commotion began the girl sprang from the
Parson’s side and finding the doors locked as she had left them,
unlatched them while Doyle was attempting to quiet the audience. Unless
she was lying—and I don’t think she was—this proves that the murderer
did not leave by these doors, since at the time the body was found they
were still locked from the inside.”
“Well, I’ll be switched!” growled Queen. “She didn’t tell me a thing
about that part of it, drat her! Wait till I get my hands on her, the
little snip!”
“Please be logical, _M. le Gardien de la Paix_,” laughed Ellery. “The
reason she didn’t tell you about bolting the doors was that you didn’t
ask her. She felt that she was in enough of an uncomfortable position
already.
“At any rate, that statement of hers would seem to dispose of the two
side-doors near the murdered man’s seat. I will admit that all sorts of
possibilities enter into the problem—for example, Madge O’Connell might
have been an accomplice. I mention this only as a possibility, and not
even as a theory. At any rate, it seems to me that the murderer would
not have run the risk of being seen leaving from side doors. Besides,
a departure in so unusual a manner and at so unusual a time would have
been all the more noticeable especially since few people leave during a
second act. And again—the murderer could have no foreknowledge of the
O’Connell girl’s dereliction in duty—if she were not an accomplice.
As the crime was carefully planned—and we must admit that from all
indications it was—the murderer would have discarded the side-doors as
a means of escape.
“This probe left, I felt, only one other channel of investigation.
That was the main entrance. And here again we received definite
testimony from the ticket-taker and the doorman outside to the effect
that no one _left_ the building during the second act by that route.
Except, of course, the harmless orangeade boy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account