World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations -- Submarine
"During my attack there was just enough sea to make depth-keeping
difficult. I fired two torpedoes, allowing 10 knots speed. One
torpedo hit just before conning tower.
"Previous to this, on the 12th, the periscope had become very stiff
to turn, and would not lower as far as the jumping-wire. During
dark hours I endeavoured to rectify same, but while doing so was
forced to dive, and so lost all the tools and parts of the centre
bush, which left the periscope in the same condition throughout the
trip. While attacking, it took two men besides myself to turn the
periscope. For this reason I did not think it advisable to attack
the destroyers after having sunk the submarine. After torpedoing
submarine, I proceeded four miles north, and lay on the bottom in
18 fathoms. Many vessels were heard in close proximity. Several
explosions, one very heavy one. On one occasion a sweep-wire
scraped the whole length of the boat along the port side, and a
vessel was heard to pass directly overhead.
"I very much regret to report my slight transgression from
orders...."
The Navy, however, takes no cognisance of zeal, if misplaced. There is
a story of a sailor of the Napoleonic wars who took a fort from the
French single-handed. The resultant row with his Commanding Officer,
who had been waiting some hours with all his men drawn up in order to
carry out that identical duty in due military form, caused him to
remark that "He'd never take another fort for them as long as he
lived." The captain of the _Maidstone_, as is the way of the Service,
shielded his subordinate from the wrath of My Lords, who were
naturally aghast at an officer having left his assigned patrol area;
but having taken the responsibility for the fault of his bull-terrier,
he proceeded to lay into him thoroughly himself, while commenting
publicly as follows:--
"Lieutenant Varley is a very able and gallant submarine officer,
and although there is no possible excuse for his having disregarded
his orders and proceeded to the Weser, it is submitted that his
skilful and successful attack on the German submarine, in spite of
a defective periscope, and his subsequent conduct, especially
during the critical time when he was being swept for by destroyers
with explosive sweeps, may be taken into consideration."
It was, however, a year before Lieutenant Varley was decorated for this
action, My Lords deciding that after that interval the example he had
created would be forgotten.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account