The accession of James II., and the consequent rebellion of Monmouth
in the interest, nominally, of Protestantism, led to the first serious
increase of the standing army; but again it is curious to note that
Monmouth’s own manifesto at Lyme Regis, where he landed, brings
prominently forward the proposal to have no standing army at all, but
only the militia. This is proof positive, if such were needed, that a
permanent military force, such as it then was, was still unpopular in
England.
There was no fighting worth mentioning in James’s reign save at
Sedgmoor, and there the only noteworthy points are the failure of
the night attack, through faulty and imperfect reconnaissance; and
the fact that Sergeant Weems of the 1st Royals received a gratuity
of £40 for serving the “great guns in an emergency.” The true use of
artillery was not understood, evidently, and the guns were attached
to infantry regiments (as they were later, and singly, to cavalry
squadrons), and James organised an “ordnance regiment” armed with
fusils, for the protection of his artillery, which finally became the
Royal Fusiliers. The only point of interest in the dreary slaughter of
the vanquished after the battle of Sedgmoor, in which the Somersetshire
clown, ill-armed and wounded, showed the greatest gallantry, is the
stern repression exercised by Colonel Kirke of the 2nd Queen’s, whose
regimental badge of the Paschal Lamb acquired an ominous significance
when applied to the cruelties inflicted by his men after the rebels
were defeated. “Kirke’s Lambs,” they were named, in derision, from
their regimental badge. Sedgmoor was the last serious battle fought on
English soil.
But the army had largely increased none the less. The troops at
Tangiers had been recalled. The king dreamed of using the army as a
means of overawing the country, and formed at Hounslow the first camp
of exercise for field manœuvres. But this effort to gain the army’s
support was made in vain. The 12th Regiment grounded its arms _en
masse_ rather than agree to support the repeal of the Test Penal Law;
the cheering of the soldiery at the acquittal of the Seven Bishops was
an unpleasant reminder that they were not with him in sympathy; and
the effort to introduce Irish Catholics in numbers into the purely
Protestant regiments met with the strongest opposition. “No man of
English blood,” says Macaulay, “then regarded the aboriginal Irish as
his countrymen; the very language spoken by the Irish was different
from their own.” No wonder, therefore, that there was friction, such as
found its full expression in the resignation of their commissions by
the colonel and five captains of the 8th Foot--resignations which were
not accepted, the offenders being tried by court martial and cashiered.
It is curious to note that Churchill, afterwards Duke of Marlborough,
thought the sentence inadequate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account