The Story of the CrusadesWilmot-Buxton, E. M. (Ethel Mary)
History
The Story of the Crusades
Wilmot-Buxton, E. M. (Ethel Mary)
Crusades
At this crisis, Bohemond, whose movements had for some time been full
of mystery, assembled the leaders {88} and asked for a solemn oath from
them that the man who succeeded in taking the city should be its future
ruler. Very unwillingly they gave their consent, upon which Bohemond
revealed the fact that he had for some time past been in communication
with an officer of the city guard, who was in the full confidence of
the governor, and could obtain possession of Antioch whenever he wished.
So, on the 2nd of June 1098, nearly six months after the beginning of
the siege, a little band of Crusaders quietly approached the gate of St
George and gave their signal. A rope ladder was silently lowered from
the top of the wall, up which Bohemond promptly sprang. But at the
summit he found himself alone; for in their distrust of him, the rest
had waited to see what would happen. The sight of his safe arrival
gave them confidence, and about sixty swarmed up the ladder, which then
broke. Those at the top, however, undeterred by their isolated
position on the walls of a hostile city, found their way in the
darkness to a gate, and broke it open. In rushed the invading army
with their battle-cry of "Deus vult! Deus vult!" and the city, taken
quite unawares, was soon in their hands.
The sun rose on the third day of June upon a city red with blood, the
governor of which had paid with his head for his courage in holding out
so long. Dawn also revealed the blood-red banner of Bohemond floating
from the highest tower. Only the citadel, by a strange oversight on
the conqueror's part, was still in the hands of a small body of Turks.
The news of the fall of Antioch gave rise to general alarm throughout
the East. The followers of Sultan David, their former foe, joined with
those of the Sultan of Persia against the Crusaders, and led by the
famous {89} general Kerboga, flung themselves against the walls of the
city. Flushed with success, the victors had overlooked the fact that
there was scarcely any food within the gates, and also they had allowed
their means of access to the Mediterranean ports to be cut off. Within
a few days the besiegers were the besieged and in far worse plight than
before. Many, even of the nobles, were seized with panic, and letting
themselves down by ropes from the walls, fled to the sea-coast. Even
Stephen of Chârtres, son-in-law of William the Conqueror, who, through
illness, had retired before the city fell, and who was now entreated to
return with his troops to its aid, lost his nerve when he looked down
from the hills upon the sea of tents that lay before the walls. Not
only did he rapidly retreat, but meeting the Emperor Alexios marching
with an army to aid the Crusaders, he actually prevailed upon the
latter, not at all against his will, to retire from the hopeless
conflict.
With foes outside the walls, and foes holding the citadel within, the
unfortunate host of Crusaders was indeed in evil case.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account