The Trouvelot astronomical drawings manualTrouvelot, E. L. (Etienne Leopold)
Science
The Trouvelot astronomical drawings manual
Trouvelot, E. L. (Etienne Leopold)
Astronomy -- Pictorial works
If the Moon has no air, and no liquids of any sort, it seems impossible
that its surface can maintain any form of life, either vegetable or
animal, analogous to those on the Earth. In fact, nothing indicating
life has been detected on the Moon--our satellite looking like a barren,
lifeless desert. If life is to be found there at all, it must be of a
very elementary nature. Aside from the want of air and water to sustain
it, the climatic conditions of our satellite are very unfavorable for
the development of life. The nights and days of the Moon are each equal
to nearly fifteen of our days and nights. For fifteen consecutive
terrestrial days the Sun's light is absent from one hemisphere of the
Moon; while for the same number of days the Sun pours down on the other
hemisphere its light and heat, the effects of which are not in any way
mitigated by an atmosphere. During the long lunar nights the temperature
must at least fall to that of our polar regions, while during its long
days it must be far above that of our tropical zone. It has been
calculated that during the lunar nights the temperature descends to 23°
below zero, while during the days it rises to 468°, or 256° above the
boiling point.
It has been a question among astronomers whether changes are still
taking place at the surface of the Moon. Aside from the fact that
change, not constancy, is the law of nature, it does not seem doubtful
that changes occur on the Moon, especially in view of the powerful
influences of contraction and dilatation to which its materials are
submitted by its severe alternations of temperature. From the distance
at which we view our satellite, we cannot expect, of course, to be able
to see changes, unless they are produced on a large scale. Theoretically
speaking, the largest telescopes ever constructed ought to show us the
Moon as it would appear to the naked eye from a distance of 40 miles;
but in practice it is very different. The difficulty is in the fact
that, while we magnify the surface of a telescopic image, we are unable
to increase its light; so that, practically, in magnifying an object, we
weaken its light proportionally to the magnifying power employed. The
light of the Moon, especially near the terminator, where we almost
always make our observations, is not sufficiently bright to bear a very
high magnifying power, and only moderate ones can be applied to its
study. What we gain by enlarging an object, we more than lose by the
weakening of its light. Besides, a high magnifying power, by increasing
the disturbances generally present in our atmosphere, renders the
telescopic image unsteady and very indistinct. On the whole, the largest
telescopes now in existence do not show us our satellite better than if
we could see it with the naked eye from a distance of 300 miles or more.
At such a distance only considerable changes would be visible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account