We will now enter into details. The accurate and sagacious
Richardson says, “The resemblance between the Northern American
wolves (_Canis lupus,_ var. _occidentalis_) and the domestic dogs
of the Indians is so great that the size and strength of the wolf
seems to be the only difference. I have more than once mistaken a
band of wolves for the dogs of a party of Indians; and the howl of
the animals of both species is prolonged so exactly in the same key
that even the practised ear of the Indian fails at times to
discriminate them.” He adds that the more northern Esquimaux dogs
are not only extremely like the grey wolves of the Arctic circle in
form and colour, but also nearly equal them in size. Dr. Kane has
often seen in his teams of sledge-dogs the oblique eye (a character
on which some naturalists lay great stress), the drooping tail, and
scared look of the wolf. In disposition the Esquimaux dogs differ
little from wolves, and, according to Dr. Hayes, they are capable
of no attachment to man, and are so savage that when hungry they
will attack even their masters. According to Kane they readily
become feral. Their affinity is so close with wolves that they
frequently cross with them, and the Indians take the whelps of
wolves “to improve the breed of their dogs.” The half-bred wolves
sometimes (Lamare-Picquot) cannot be tamed, “though this case is
rare;” but they do not become thoroughly well broken in till the
second or third generation. These facts show that there can be but
little, if any, sterility between the Esquimaux dog and the wolf,
for otherwise they would not be used to improve the breed. As Dr.
Hayes says of these dogs, “reclaimed wolves they doubtless
are.”[14]
North America is inhabited by a second kind of wolf, the
prairie-wolf (_Canis latrans_), which is now looked at by all
naturalists as specifically distinct from the common wolf; and is,
according to Mr. J.K. Lord, in some respects intermediate in habits
between a wolf and a fox. Sir J. Richardson, after describing the
Hare Indian dog, which differs in many respects from the Esquimaux
dog, says, “It bears the same relation to the prairie-wolf that the
Esquimaux dog does to the great grey wolf.” He could, in fact,
detect no marked difference between them; and Messrs. Nott and
Gliddon give additional details showing their close resemblance.
The dogs derived from the above two aboriginal sources cross
together and with the wild wolves, at least with the _C.
occidentalis,_ and with European dogs. In Florida, according to
Bartram, the black wolf-dog of the Indians differs in nothing from
the wolves of that country except in barking.[15]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account