The war myth in United States historyHamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
History
The war myth in United States history
Hamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
Propaganda, American; United States -- History; War
McKinley, during this period, opposed intervention, but the war
party, supported by the Hearst papers, was growing rapidly. Our able
minister in Spain, General Woodford, was also opposed to our
intervention. Congress, however, held the opposite attitude. A
senator said to Assistant Secretary of State Day: "Day, doesn't your
President know where the war-declaring power is lodged? Tell him
that if he doesn't do something, Congress will exercise the power."
Congressman Boutelle, who was opposed to the war, says that forty or
fifty Republican members of Congress held a caucus and sent a
committee to the President stating that unless he asked for a
declaration of war, they would propose a resolution for war and carry
it through. Secretary of War Alger, who was a notorious spoilsman,
said to a senator: "I want you to advise the President to declare
war. He is making a great mistake. He is in danger of ruining
himself and the Republican party by standing in the way of the
people's wishes. Congress will declare war in spite of him. He'll
get run over and the party with him." Rhodes, in "McKinley and
Roosevelt Administrations," on page 64, says: "McKinley feared a
rupture in his own party, and on account of that fear, had not the
nerve and power to resist the pressure for war. We may rest assured
that if Mark Hanna had been President, there would have been no war
with Spain."
McKinley was opposed to the war up to the last of March, 1898. Only
two members of his cabinet were in favor of war. Also, the
Vice-President was against it, as was Mark Hanna, the Speaker of the
House, and nearly all the leading Republicans of the Senate.
On March 29, 1898, McKinley sent his ultimatum to Spain demanding the
complete abandonment of the concentration policy, the granting of an
armistice to Cuba, and the opening of peace negotiations through
himself with the insurgents. Spain replied granting the complete
abandonment of the concentration policy and did not refuse to grant
the armistice, but told our minister, General Woodford, that she
would gladly grant it, if the Cubans, who were the resistors, asked
for it, for Spain could not first offer it. Our minister at Madrid
then cabled McKinley that the Spanish government and people wished to
settle the difficulty without war, and that in a few months' time, he
would "get peace in Cuba, with justice to Cuba and protection to our
great American interests."
Let us say, for example, that Japan had sent an ultimatum to McKinley
during the Philippine insurrection, demanding that he change his
policy of coercion and grant an armistice to the Philippines. Such a
demand would have been treated with contempt, yet that is what we
demanded of Spain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account