The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon — John Shaqi
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Exactly how the Indian infantry were armed is left uncertain. They
probably had not the solidity of the Greek phalanx and were depended
upon only to cover the work of the elephants. Alexander kept his
infantry in reserve until he was able to confuse the line of the enemy
by a cavalry attack. His cavalry he directed to spread out and attack
not only in front but on the flanks as well. This manœuver was executed
with practised precision, and neither the Indian chariots nor their
horse could withstand the furious onslaught of the Greek squadrons,
and soon retired behind the elephants with the Macedonians in close
pursuit. As the elephants wheeled round, passing through the infantry
in order to meet the Macedonians, the quick advance was blocked; the
horses could not be induced to charge. They were obliged to retire;
then Porus, on his side, vigorously attacked both the Macedonian
cavalry and the phalanx.
The fight was now a general one. The Greek authorities paint this stage
of the battle in superlative diction, describing how the elephants
pressed through the thickly packed masses in front of them, rending and
trampling the soldiers and horses as they went, while the engines on
their backs scattered destruction far and wide. But the Macedonians
finally won by striking down the elephants’ drivers and destroying the
turrets they were in, and so wounded the beasts themselves that they
ceased to attack. With the elephants rendered useless, the chance of
victory for the Indians was gone. Their infantry was not sufficiently
disciplined to make any use of the confusion caused in the Greek ranks
by the work of the elephants. Besides, the Macedonian cavalry had in
the first stage of the engagement got so far into the Indian lines,
that they remained not only on the field of battle, but actually were,
as the engagement advanced, behind both the enemy’s infantry and the
elephants as well. When the Indian cavalry tried to take a hand in
the fight and leave the part of the field where the elephants were in
action, the Greek horse, having a superiority in numbers, forced them
back.
The Greek infantry phalanx had been ordered by Alexander to keep its
ground, but when the cavalry fight made it impossible for the Indians
to move forward, the Greek foot soldiers drew away from their first
position, where they were liable to a frontal attack by the elephants,
and driving the elephants back, exposed the enemy to an attack by the
Macedonian horse. Unprotected as the Indians were on both sides, they
could not escape defeat, and at this point of the battle they suffered
severely; most of the elephants and King Porus himself were taken
prisoners.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account