Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
He says, further, that “many other persons would appear such as Jesus
was, to those who were willing to be deceived.” Let this Jew of Celsus
then show us, not many persons, nor even a few, but a single individual,
such as Jesus was, introducing among the human race, with the power that
was manifested in Him, a system of doctrine and opinions beneficial to
human life, and which converts men from the practice of wickedness. He
says, moreover, that this charge is brought against the Jews by the
Christian converts, that they have not believed in Jesus as in God. Now
on this point we have, in the preceding pages, offered a preliminary
defence, showing at the same time in what respects we understand Him to
be God, and in what we take Him to be man. “How should we,” he
continues, “who have made known to all men that there is to come from
God one who is to punish the wicked, treat him with disregard when he
came?” And to this, as an exceedingly silly argument, it does not seem
to me reasonable to offer any answer. It is as if some one were to say,
“How could we, who teach temperance, commit any act of licentiousness?
or we, who are ambassadors for righteousness, be guilty of any
wickedness?” For as these inconsistencies are found among men, so, to
say that they believed the prophets when speaking of the future advent
of Christ, and yet refused their belief to Him when He came, agreeably
to prophetic statement, was quite in keeping with human nature. And
since we must add another reason, we shall remark that this very result
was foretold by the prophets. Isaiah distinctly declares: “Hearing ye
shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall
not perceive: for the heart of this people has become fat,”[57] etc. And
let them explain why it was predicted to the Jews, that although they
both heard and saw, they would not understand what was said, nor
perceive what was seen as they ought. For it is indeed manifest, that
when they beheld Jesus they did not see who He was; and when they heard
Him, they did not understand from His words the divinity that was in
Him, and which transferred God’s providential care, hitherto exercised
over the Jews, to His converts from the heathen. Therefore we may see,
that after the advent of Jesus the Jews were altogether abandoned, and
possess now none of what were considered their ancient glories, so that
there is no indication of any Divinity abiding amongst them. For they
have no longer prophets nor miracles, traces of which to a considerable
extent are still found among Christians, and some of them more
remarkable than any that existed among the Jews; and these we ourselves
have witnessed, if our testimony may be received. But the Jew of Celsus
exclaims: “Why did we treat him, whom we announced beforehand, with
dishonour? Was it that we might be chastised more than others?” To which
we have to answer, that on account of their unbelief, and the other
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account