The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia — John Shaqi
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammaliaOwen, Richard
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia
Owen, Richard
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals, Fossil; Paleontology -- South America; Zoology
In the relations of the plane of the internal orifice of the anterior
condyloid foramen with that of the foramen magnum, we search in vain for
a corresponding structure in any of the Mammiferous orders, save the
Edentata:[30] and among these the Orycterope comes nearest the
Glossothere in this respect. In the degree of development of the
internal osseous ridge giving attachment to the tentorium cerebelli, the
Ant-eaters and Armadillos more resemble the Glossothere than does the
Orycterope; in which a continuous bony plate arches across the cranial
cavity: in the Manis a still greater proportion of the tentorium is
ossified, and it consequently recedes the furthest amongst the Edentata,
in this, as in most other particulars of the cranial organization, from
the Glossothere. The chief distinctive peculiarity in the cranium of the
Glossothere, so far as it can be studied in the present fragment, and
compared with that of other Edentata, is the deep, well-marked,
semicircular styloid depression, above described.
A question may arise after perusing the preceding evidence, upon which
the present fossil is referred to a great Edentate species nearly allied
to the _Orycteropus_, whether one or other of the lower jaws,
subsequently to be described, and in like manner referable, from their
dentition, either to the _Orycteropodoid_ or _Dasypodoid_ families of
Edentata, may not have belonged to the same species as does the present
mutilated cranium. I can only answer, that those jaws were discovered by
Mr. Darwin in a different and very remote locality,—that no fragments or
teeth referable to them were found associated with the present fossil;
and that, as it would be, therefore, impossible to determine from the
evidence we have now before us, which of the two lower jaws should be
associated with _Glossotherium_; and as both may with equal if not
greater probability belong to a totally distinct genus, it appears to me
to be preferable, both in regard to the advancement of our knowledge of
these most interesting Edentata of an ancient world, as well as for the
convenience of their description, to assign to them, for the present,
distinct generic appellations.
The figures in Plate XVI. preclude the necessity of a table of
admeasurements of the cranial fragment of _Glossotherium_.
DESCRIPTION OF A MUTILATED LOWER JAW AND TEETH, ON WHICH IS FOUNDED A
SUBGENUS OF MEGATHERIOID EDENTATA, UNDER THE NAME OF
MYLODON.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account