Theism or Atheism: The Great Alternative — John Shaqi
Theism or Atheism: The Great AlternativeCohen, Chapman
Religion
Theism or Atheism: The Great Alternative
Cohen, Chapman
Atheism; Theism
In these forests the multitude of insects that bite, sting, devour,
and prey on other creatures, often with accompaniments of atrocious
suffering, passes belief. The very pathetic myths of beneficent
nature could not deceive even the least wise being if he once saw
the iron cruelty of life in the tropics. Of course, "nature"--in
common parlance a wholly inaccurate term, by the way, especially
when used to express a single entity--is entirely ruthless, no less
so as regards types than as regards individuals, and entirely
indifferent to good or evil, and works out her ends or no ends
with utter disregard of pain and woe (Cited by E. D. Fawcett in
_The World as Imagination_; pp. 571-2).
And Mr. Carveth Reade expresses the same thing in a more elaborate
summing up:--
The merciless character of organic evolution appears to us, first,
in reckless propagation and the consequent destruction. Every
species is as prolific as it can be compatibly with the development
of its individuals; and the deaths that ensue from inanition,
disease, violence, present a stupefying scene. The best one can say
for it is that, as life rises in the organic scale, the death rate
declines. Yet even man still suffers outrageously by violence,
disease, inanition; the notion that "Malthus's Law" no longer holds
of civilised man is a foolish delusion. But more sinister than the
direct destruction of life is the spectacle of innumerable species
profiting by a life, parasitic or predatory, at the expense of
others. The parasites refute the vulgar prejudice that evolution is
by the measure of man, progressive; adaptation is indifferent to
better or worse, except as to each species, that its offspring
shall survive by atrophy and degradation. The predatory species
flourish as if in derision of moral maxims; we see that though
human morality is natural to man, it is far from expressing the
whole of Nature. Animals, at first indistinguishable vegetables,
devour them and enjoy a far richer life. Animals that eat other
animals are nearly always superior not only in strength, grace and
agility but in intelligence. There are exceptions to this rule;
some snakes eat monkeys (thanking Providence), and the elephant is
content with foliage; but compare cats and wolves with the
ungulates that make a first concoction of herbs for their sake. It
is true that our monkey kin are chiefly frugivorous; for it may be
plausibly argued that man was first differentiated by becoming
definitely carnivorous, a sociable hunter, as it were, a wolf-ape.
Hence the advantage of longer legs, the use of weapons, the upright
gait and defter hands to use and make weapons, more strategic
brains, tribal organisation, and hence liberation from the tropical
forest, and citizenship of the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account