Theodore Savage: A Story of the Past or the FutureHamilton, Cicely
Science
Theodore Savage: A Story of the Past or the Future
Hamilton, Cicely
Apocalyptic fiction; End of the world -- Fiction; Regression (Civilization) -- Fiction; Science fiction
“What’s left of the army,” said the other, “that’s all that hangs
together. Bits of it, here and there—getting smaller, losing touch with
the other bits; hanging on to its rations—what’s left of ’em.... And we
hold together just as long as we can fight back the rabble; not an hour,
not a minute longer! When we’ve gnawed our way through the last of our
rations—what then?... You may do what you like, but I’m keeping a shot
for myself. Whether we’re through with it or whether we’re not. Just
stopping fighting won’t clear up this mess.... And I’ll die—what I am.
Not rabble!”
* * * * *
Whether after days or whether after weeks, there came a time when they
ceased to have dealings with the world beyond their wire defences; when
the store-sheds in the camp were all but emptied of their hoard of
foodstuffs and such military authority as might still exist took no
further interest in the doings of a useless garrison. Orders and
communications, once frequent, grew fewer, and finally, as military
authority crumbled, they were left to isolation, to their own defence
and devices. Since no man any longer had need of them, they were cut off
from intercourse with those other remnants of the life disciplined
whence lorries had once arrived in search of rations; separated from
such other bands of their fellows as still held together, they were no
longer part of an army, were nothing but a band of armed men. Though
their own daily rations were cut down to the barest necessities of life,
there was little grumbling, since even the dullest knew the reason; as
the airman had told them, they were living on their own fat, for so long
as their own fat lasted. For all their isolation, their fears and daily
perils kept them disciplined; they held together, obeyed orders and kept
watch, not because they still felt themselves part of a nation or a
military force, but because there remained in their common keeping the
means to support bare life. It was not loyalty or patriotism, but the
sense of their common danger, their common need of defence against the
famished world outside their camp, that kept them comrades, obedient to
a measure of discipline, and made them still a community.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account