Benton, Thomas Hart, 1782-1858; Legislators -- United States -- Biography
My objections to this bill, and to its mode of being passed, were
deep and abiding, and went far beyond its own obnoxious provisions,
and all the transient and temporary considerations connected with
it.... A compromise made with a state in arms is a capitulation to
that state.... The injury was great then, and a permanent evil
example. It remitted the government to the condition of the old
confederation, acting upon sovereignties instead of individuals. It
violated the feature of our Union which discriminated it from all
confederacies that ever existed, and which was wisely and
patriotically put into the Constitution to save it from the fate
which had attended all confederacies, ancient and modern.... The
framers of our Constitution established a Union instead of a
League--to be sovereign and independent within its sphere, acting
upon persons through its own laws and courts, instead of acting on
communities through persuasion or force. The effect of this
compromise legislation was to destroy this great feature of our
Union--to bring the general and state governments into conflict--and
to substitute a sovereign state for an offending individual as often
as a state chose to make the cause of that individual her own.
Not only was Benton's interpretation of the Constitution sound, and one
that by the course of events has now come to be universally accepted,
but his criticisms on the wisdom of the compromise bill were perfectly
just. Had the Anti-Nullifiers stood firm, the Nullifiers would probably
have given way, and if not, would certainly have been crushed. Against a
solid North and West, with a divided South, even her own people not
being unanimous, and with Jackson as chief executive, South Carolina
could not have made even a respectable resistance. A salutary lesson
then might very possibly have saved infinite trouble and bloodshed
thereafter. But in Jackson's case it must be remembered that, so far as
his acts depended purely upon his own will and judgment, no fault can be
found with him; he erred only in ratifying a compromise agreed to by the
vast majority of the representatives of the people in both houses of
Congress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account