Up till the year 1890 the rotation period of Venus was usually stated
at twenty-three hours twenty-one minutes, or thereby, though this
figure was only accepted with some hesitation, as in order to
arrive at it there had to be some gentle squeezing of inconvenient
observations. But in that year Schiaparelli announced that his
observations were only consistent with a long period of rotation,
which could not be less than six months, and was not greater
than nine. The announcement naturally excited much discussion.
Schiaparelli's views were strongly controverted, and for a time the
astronomical world seemed to be almost equally divided in opinion.
Gradually, however, the conclusion has come to be more and more
accepted that Venus, like Mercury, rotates upon her axis in the same
time as she takes to make her journey round the sun--in other words,
that her day and her year are of the same length, amounting to about
225 of our days. In 1900 the controversy was to some extent reopened
by the statement of the Russian astronomer Bélopolsky that his
spectroscopic investigations pointed to a much more rapid rotation--to
a period, indeed, considerably shorter than twenty-four hours. It
is difficult, however, to reconcile this with the absence of polar
flattening in the globe of Venus. Lowell's spectroscopic observations
are stated by him to point to a period in accordance with his
telescopic results--namely, 225 days. The matter can scarcely be
regarded as settled in the meantime, but the balance of evidence seems
in favour of the longer period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account