To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novelMcKenna, Stephen
History
To-morrow and to-morrow ... a novel
McKenna, Stephen
Great Britain -- History -- George V, 1910-1936 -- Fiction; Man-woman relationships -- Fiction; Spouses -- Fiction
“You can’t expect people to take much interest in public affairs,” Lady
Dainton said to me at this first dinner. “There are _so_ many other
things! These children”—she looked benevolently round the table at the
girls she had collected for the approval of her necessitous son—“they
don’t know what society _was_ before the war. They’ve none of them even
been presented, so you can imagine the flutter they’re in. Their first
season!”
“I shouldn’t have thought any one had the money to make much of a
season,” I objected, with a cast back to her late confession of
universal ruin.
“The war has only transferred it from one pocket to another,” she
assured me.
This dark saying was made plain in these first unsettled days before the
rebirth of our paper, when I drifted about London, analysing the
atmosphere of the armistice. Less diplomatically, Lady Dainton might
have said that, if the natives had too little money, the foreigners had
too much; and, without a trace of diplomacy, a number of my
acquaintances seemed to be coaxing it back from the new pockets to the
old. With my own ears I heard the Duchess of Ross demanding a list of
the Americans she could advantageously invite to her house. I listened
with amusement as Clifford van Oss tried to explain politely that the
people on whom she fawned were not received in New York. And I watched
Sir Adolf Erckmann being made a test case for the date at which a
wealthy man with a German name could be received by his less wealthy
friends.
“The great movement of men isn’t carrying me anywhere in particular,” I
confessed to Bertrand as the day of our first issue drew near. “I’ve met
a number of spongers, lately, and a greater number of snobs. Which are
the more to be pitied . . .”
“That’s only a phase,” my uncle answered. “London’s only a part of
England; these people are only a part of London. While you were a boy,
you must have seen the Rand Jews agonizing to fill their houses; and you
saw the ‘new poor’ of the Harcourt death duties taking all they could
get.”
“And we saw the result in the last years before the war,” I said, as Sir
Adolf Erckmann shambled out of earshot. Could we give rein to our racial
prejudices, I never knew whether I would sooner lynch him or the girls,
like Sonia Dainton, who in those days had endured his odious
familiarities for the sake of a string-quartet, a champagne supper and a
free drive home in an Erckmann car. “A whole generation grew up in the
belief that man had a natural right to be amused at some one else’s
expense.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account