In a previous chapter, I gave a full account of the experiments made
at Hallett’s Point, New York. On that occasion, General Newton, of
the United States Engineers, reported to me that he considered that
Nitro-Glycerin, in point of economy and power, had the advantage over
both dualin and powder even when supplemented by fulminating fuse.
The advantages claimed (only by the inventor) for dualin, are, that
it is cheaper, safer, and more powerful than Nitro-Glycerin, and some
experiments made in Prussia, are adduced in proof. I have to observe,
on this point, that the Nitro-Glycerin made by the Nobel process,
probably used in Prussia, is very inferior to the Tri-Nitro-Glycerin
made by my process, both in stability and in explosive force, and it
is much more readily exploded, fifteen grains of fulminate of mercury
being necessary to ensure explosion of this latter, without chance of
failure. Nobel’s Nitro-Glycerin is said to expand when solid, in which
state the slightest friction is said to explode it, while Mowbray’s
Tri-Nitro-Glycerin actually contracts about one-tenth in bulk when
solidifying, and cannot be exploded when in the solid state, except
by a heavy charge of fluid Nitro-Glycerin fired with it. Nobel’s
preparation is yellow, and gives off nitrous fumes, and is claimed by
the patentee to solidify at 50°F, while Mowbray’s is colorless as water
and solidifies at 45°F.
It may be possible, but not probable, therefore, that Nobel’s
Nitro-Glycerin is inferior to Dittmar’s dualin, as used in Prussia;
the latter then said to have been a preparation of nitrate of ammonia,
sawdust immersed in sulpho-nitric acid and Nitro-Glycerin: but that
40 per cent. of washed sawdust (not treated with sulpho-nitric acid),
moistened with 60 per cent. of a dark colored and evidently impure
Nitro-Glycerin, and such was Dittmar’s dualin analysed by me, should
surpass, in blasting, a chemically pure Nitro-Glycerin, is to expect 60
cents of currency to have more value than 100 cents of gold, or that a
part is greater than the whole.
As I have above referred to my analysis of Mr. Dittmar’s dualin, I will
give in full the process and result of the same, for the benefit of the
reader.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account