Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
BRIGADIER GENERAL TAYLOR: Your Honor, needless to say, we have no
objection to the making of this motion or the filing of this brief. It
is needless to say, also, that we think the indictment quite adequately
specifies the date, place, and type of experiment charged. The
defendant’s connection with it is better known to the defendant than to
anyone else. There is no reason why he should not enter his plea at this
time.
JUDGE SEBRING: That would not go to the jurisdictional aspect of the
indictment, but it would go to the question of particulars. The
consideration is whether or not upon the showing of the motion, more
particulars as to the charges specified, should be included. Do you
understand my point?
BRIGADIER GENERAL TAYLOR: Yes, your Honor. That is what I understood.
The prosecution will consider the motion, and if need be, submit
particulars, although we think the indictment is adequate enough. We
think there is no challenge of the jurisdiction. The defendant should be
required to promptly plead.
JUDGE CRAWFORD: How do you plead to the charges against you?
DEFENDANT SCHAEFER: Not guilty.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: Be seated.
[At this point the balance of the defendants: Waldemar Hoven,
Wilhelm Beiglboeck, Adolf Pokorny, Herta Oberheuser and Fritz
Fischer were arraigned. All were represented by counsel. All
pleaded not guilty to the indictment.]
DR. SERVATIUS: Servatius for the defendant Karl Brandt. Your Honor, may
I make an application regarding the submission of documents by the
prosecution?
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: You may state your application.
DR. SERVATIUS: Your Honor, I ask the Tribunal to instruct the
prosecution that the documents be submitted to the defense in time, the
documents on which the charge is based. This would make the proceedings
easier and give the defense an opportunity to examine the documents in
time, and to obtain counterproof.
In the first trial before the International Military Tribunal, we were
given a list of documents with the indictment; although these documents
were not enclosed, we could look at them and we could work on them. Up
to now we have nothing on which we can build our defense. In other
words, on the 9th of December, we will have proceeded no further than
today, and we will not be able to advise our clients.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: You may be seated and we will hear from the
prosecution, Brigadier General Telford Taylor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account