Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II — John Shaqi
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Another of the rather common defenses urged by the defendants is that
the experimental subjects were criminals condemned to death who,
provided they survived the experiment, were rewarded by commutation of
their sentence to life imprisonment in a concentration camp. For one who
has even the slightest knowledge of the conditions in concentration
camps and the life expectancy of an average inmate, this alleged defense
assumes the aspect of a ghastly joke. We need only recall the remark
made by one of the women used by Rascher to reward his frozen victims in
Dachau, who when asked by him why she had volunteered for the camp
brothel, replied: “rather half a year in a brothel than half a year in a
concentration camp.” But the defects in this spurious defense run much
deeper. Concentration camps were not ordinary penal institutions, such
as are known in other countries, for the commitment of persons convicted
of crimes by courts. The very purpose of concentration camps was the
oppression and persecution of persons who were considered undesirable by
the Nazi regime on racial, political, and religious grounds. Hundreds of
thousands of victims were confined to concentration camps because they
were simply Jews, Slavs, or gypsies, Free Masons, Social Democrats, or
Communists. They were not tried for any offense and sentenced by a
court, not even a Nazi court. They were imprisoned on the basis of
“protective custody orders” issued by the RSHA. Tens of thousands were
condemned to death on the single order of Himmler, who, as Gebhardt put
it so well, “had the power to execute thousands of people by a stroke of
his pen.” (_Tr. p. 4025._) There were, indeed, a relatively small group
of inmates who might be classed as ordinary criminals. These were men
who had served out their sentences in an ordinary prison and then were
committed to concentration camps for still further detention. A
memorandum of 18 September 1942 by Thierack, the Minister of Justice,
concerning a conversation with Himmler, tells us the fate of those
unfortunates:
“The delivery of anti-social elements from the execution of
their sentence to the Reich Leader SS to be worked to death.
Persons under protective arrest, Jews, gypsies, Russians and
Ukrainians, Poles with more than 3-year sentences, Czechs and
Germans with more than 8-year sentences, according to the
decision of the Reich Minister for Justice.” (_654-PS, Pros. Ex.
562._)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account