Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III — John Shaqi
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
PRESIDING JUDGE MARSHALL: Does the prosecution desire to make
any comment at this time upon the point raised?
MR. LAFOLLETTE: Unfortunately, and it is no fault of the
defendants’ counsel, I didn’t hear what was coming through the phones.
As I understand two points were raised--the fact that no documents were
filed with defendants’ counsel in their room. Those will be furnished.
Secondly, with reference to the objection raised to the indictment, I
believe the rules require the objections should be reduced to writing.
In any event I think it would serve the purpose if the objection to
the indictment was reduced to writing, and then Your Honors would pick
such time as you see fit to dispose of the motion, and we can argue it
at that time more intelligently than we could at this moment. I do not
desire to take advantage of technicalities, but I hope the record will
note that defense counsel have duly raised the objection, and at such
time as it is to be disposed of it will be reduced to writing before
it is disposed of. I think it only reasonable that it be reduced to
writing.
PRESIDING JUDGE MARSHALL: The defendants’ counsel will be
required to reduce certain matters to writing, as requested by the
prosecution, and it is possible that we will want to dispose of that
matter between now and 5 March if it is agreeable to counsel on both
sides.
DR. KOESSL: I have already submitted the same request in
writing.
MR. LAFOLLETTE: If that has been submitted in writing I think
Your Honors have indicated we may, within a reasonable time after you
have seen it, wish to dispose of that prior to 5 March, or on 5 March,
whichever Your Honors shall see fit. That will be satisfactory to us.
PRESIDING JUDGE MARSHALL: I suggest, in that connection, after
you have seen the written matter that you advise the Tribunal when we
are not in session as to your wishes.
MR. LAFOLLETTE: I shall be glad to do that, Judge. I assume we
will wait and take not only the objections on behalf of the defendant
Rothaug, but also any objections which have been filed by counsel on
behalf of any other defendants. After they have been submitted and
I have had an opportunity to see them, I will confer with defense
counsel, and perhaps after that we will have time to confer with the
Court as to the time of disposition.
PRESIDING JUDGE MARSHALL: Are there any other counsel
representing defendants who desire to present any matters at this time?
If not, the order for recess will stand.
(The Tribunal adjourned until 0930 hours, 5 March 1947.)
III. OPENING STATEMENTS
A. Opening Statement for the Prosecution[9]
BRIGADIER GENERAL TAYLOR: This case is unusual in that the
defendants are charged with crimes committed in the name of the law.
These men, together with their deceased or fugitive colleagues, were
the embodiment of what passed for justice in the Third Reich.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account