Social problems; Socialism -- United States; Working class -- United States
entering upon the transition stage to which all the world must ultimately
come.
This change of direction must be either toward industrial oligarchies or
socialism. Either the functions of private corporations will increase
till they absorb the central government, or the functions of government
will increase till it absorbs the corporations. Much may be said on the
chance of the oligarchy. Should an old manufacturing nation lose its
foreign trade, it is safe to predict that a strong effort would be made
to build a socialistic government, but it does not follow that this
effort would be successful. With the moneyed class controlling the State
and its revenues and all the means of subsistence, and guarding its own
interests with jealous care, it is not at all impossible that a strong
curb could be put upon the masses till the crisis were past. It has been
done before. There is no reason why it should not be done again. At the
close of the last century, such a movement was crushed by its own folly
and immaturity. In 1871 the soldiers of the economic rulers stamped out,
root and branch, a whole generation of militant socialists.
Once the crisis were past, the ruling class, still holding the curb in
order to make itself more secure, would proceed to readjust things and to
balance consumption with production. Having a monopoly of the safe
investments, the great masses of unremunerative capital would be
directed, not to the production of more surplus value, but to the making
of permanent improvements, which would give employment to the people, and
make them content with the new order of things. Highways, parks, public
buildings, monuments, could be builded; nor would it be out of place to
give better factories and homes to the workers. Such in itself would be
socialistic, save that it would be done by the oligarchs, a class apart.
With the interest rate down to zero, and no field for the investment of
sporadic capital, savings among the people would utterly cease, and
old-age pensions be granted as a matter of course. It is also a logical
necessity of such a system that, when the population began to press
against the means of subsistence, (expansion being impossible), the birth
rate of the lower classes would be lessened. Whether by their own
initiative, or by the interference of the rulers, it would have to be
done, and it would be done. In other words, the oligarchy would mean the
capitalization of labor and the enslavement of the whole population. But
it would be a fairer, juster form of slavery than any the world has yet
seen. The per capita wage and consumption would be increased, and, with
a stringent control of the birth rate, there is no reason why such a
country should not be so ruled through many generations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account