England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century; Great Britain -- History -- William IV, 1830-1837
"September 3.--This King is a queer fellow. Our Council was,
principally, for a new Great Seal, and to deface the old Seal.
The Chancellor claims the old one as his perquisite. I had
forgotten the hammer,[9] so the King said, 'My Lord, the best
thing I can do, is to give you the Seal, and tell you to take it,
and do what you please with it.' The Chancellor said, 'Sir, I
believe there is some doubt whether Lord Lyndhurst ought not to
have half of it, as he was Chancellor at the time of your
Majesty's accession.' 'Well,' said the King, 'then, I will judge
between you, like Solomon; here' (turning the Seal round and
round), 'now do you cry heads or tails?' We all laughed, and the
Chancellor said, 'Sir, I take the bottom part.' The King opened
the two compartments of the Seal, and said, 'Now, then, I employ
you as Ministers of taste. You will send for Bridge, my
silversmith, and desire him to convert the two halves, each into
a salver, with my arms on one side, and yours on the other, and
Lord Lyndhurst's the same; and you will take one, and give him
the other, and both keep them as presents from me.'"
[Footnote 9: Defacing an old Great Seal is a very perfunctory
performance. The two halves are slightly tapped with a hammer, and the
seal is, by a fiction, supposed to be so defaced as to be incapable of
being used again.]
We, lately, have heard a great deal against the House of Lords, even
to its being abolished, but this was as nothing compared to the
feeling excited by the Reform Bill. At half-past five on the morning
of September 22nd, the Bill was read a third time, and passed, in the
House of Commons, by a majority of 113. It then went to the Lords, and
on the second reading Lord Wharncliffe moved, "That the Bill be read
that day six months." The Lords had five days' debate upon the Bill,
and rejected it on October 7th by a majority of 41.
This raised the ire of the Reform party; and, as was the custom of
the age, riots ensued. The _Annual Register_ gives the following
condensed account of them:--
"The rejection of the Reform Bill caused some partial
disturbances in the country. At Derby, a mob, on Saturday and
Sunday, the 8th and 9th, committed several outrages, attacked the
city gaol, set the prisoners at liberty, and then proceeded to
the county gaol, where they were resisted and foiled in the
attempt: on Monday evening quiet was restored, but not before
several lives were lost, and many persons wounded. One young man,
son of Mr. Haden, surgeon, was killed by the mob.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account