Zoological Illustrations, Volume 2: or, Original Figures and Descriptions of New, Rare, or Interesting AnimalsSwainson, William
Science
Zoological Illustrations, Volume 2: or, Original Figures and Descriptions of New, Rare, or Interesting Animals
Swainson, William
Animals -- Pictorial works
Helix Ampullacea. _var._ _Gmelin_, _p._ 3626. _no._ 43. _Chemnitz_, 9
_tab._ 128. _fig._ 1133. 1134. _p._ 105.
* * * * *
This is the most common of the two shells of this genus, which have their
mouths closed by a shelly operculum. It is well described by Chemnitz, and
his figures are very tolerable; yet, like all the authors of that period,
he considered it as a variety of _Helix ampullacea_. From all these
supposed varieties it is, nevertheless, quite distinct; the spire is more
depressed than that of any other species, and the umbilicus is placed near
the bottom of the inner lip: the whole shell is very smooth, and, although
generally of a uniform yellowish olive colour, is sometimes marked by
narrow bands of purple brown. The margin of the outer lip is slightly
reflected, and the colour, beneath the epidermis, almost white. It is a
native of the rivers of India.
From the remarks on this genus, made at Plate 103, the fact of their
opercula being either shelly or horny, is sufficiently established. These
formations, however, there is every reason to suppose, may generally be
detected by the following indications. In such species as have a shelly
operculum, the margin of the aperture is thickened all round, and has a
parallel internal groove for its reception: the probable use of this groove
I have detailed elsewhere. On the other hand, in those species which are
known to have horny opercula, this margin and groove do not exist; and that
part of the shell which is between the top of the aperture and the
umbilicus, is thin and unprotected. This latter formation is by far the
most frequent, and leads to the conclusion that the majority of these
shells have their opercula horny.
On the distinctions between this genus and _Planorbis_, little need be
said. The principal difference consists in the latter having no operculum;
but another, and a very remarkable one, (which seems to have escaped all
writers,) is, that the shells of the latter genus are destitute of any
columella. The _Planorbis cornu-arietis_ of Lamarck, has been removed by
Mr. G. Sowerby to this genus. This shell, it is true, appears to be
intermediate between one and the other; but the only affinity which it
bears to _Ampullaria_, is in the oval form of the aperture; while it is
allied to _Planorbis_ by its discoid form, want of the columella, and being
universally described as without an operculum: the preponderance of
evidence is clearly in favour of the situation originally assigned to it by
Lamarck.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account