A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger CatechismRidgley, Thomas
Religion
A Body of Divinity, Vol. 1 (of 4): Wherein the doctrines of the Christian religion are explained and defended, being the substance of several lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism
a transparent substance, the hour could not be seen without opening
the case. This mechanism being observed (it requires indeed an
examination of the instrument, and perhaps some previous knowledge of
the subject, to perceive and understand it; but being once, as we have
said, observed and understood,) the inference, we think, is
inevitable; that the watch must have had a maker; that there must have
existed, at some time, and at some place or other, an artificer, or
artificers who formed it for the purpose which we find it actually to
answer; who comprehended its construction, and designed its use.
“I. Nor would it, I apprehend, weaken the conclusion that we had never
seen a watch made; that we had never known an artist capable of making
one; that we were altogether incapable of executing such a piece of
workmanship ourselves, or of understanding in what manner it was
performed: all this being no more than what is true of some exquisite
remains of some ancient art, of some lost arts, and, to the generality
of mankind, of the more curious productions of modern manufacture.
Does one man in a million know how oval frames are turned? Ignorance
of this kind exalts our opinion of the unseen and unknown artist’s
skill, if he be unseen and unknown, but raises no doubts in our minds
of the existence and agency of such an artist, at some former time,
and in some place or other. Nor can I perceive that it varies at all,
the inference, whether the question arise concerning a human agent, or
concerning an agent of a different species, or an agent possessing, in
some respects, a different nature.
“II. Neither, secondly, would it invalidate our conclusion, that the
watch sometimes went wrong, or that it seldom went exactly right. The
purpose of the machinery, the design, and the designer, might be
evident, and in the case supposed would be evident, in whatever way we
accounted for the irregularity of the movement, or whether we could
account for it or not. It is not necessary that a machine be perfect,
in order to shew with what design it was made: still less necessary,
where the only question is, whether it were made with any design at
all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account