A Discourse Presented to the Most Serene Don Cosimo II., Great Duke of Tuscany, Concerning the Natation of Bodies Vpon, and Submersion In, the Water.Galilei, Galileo
Science
A Discourse Presented to the Most Serene Don Cosimo II., Great Duke of Tuscany, Concerning the Natation of Bodies Vpon, and Submersion In, the Water.
Galilei, Galileo
Hydrostatics; Specific gravity
Now, pursuing my purpose, I say; that it needs not, that we have
recourse to the Tenacity, that the parts of the water have amongst
themselves, by which they resist and oppose Division, Distraction, and
Seperation, because there is no such Coherence and Resistance of
Division for if there were, it would be no less in the internall parts
than in those nearer the superiour or externall Surface, so that the
same Board, finding alwayes the same Resistance and Renitence, would
no less stop in the middle of the water than about the Surface, which
is false. Moreover, what Resistance can we place in the Continuity of
the water, if we see that it is impossible to find any Body of
whatsoever Matter, Figure or Magnitude, which being put into the
water, shall be obstructed and impeded by the Tenacity of the parts of
the water to one another, so, but that it is moved upwards or
downwards, according as the Cause of their Motion transports it? And,
what greater proof of it can we desier, than that which we daily see
in Muddy waters, which being put into Vessels to be drunk, and being,
after some hours setling[58], still, as we say, thick in the end, after
four or six dayes they are wholly setled, and become pure and clear?
Nor can their Resistance of Penetration stay those impalpable and
insensible Atomes of Sand, which by reason of their exceeding small
force, spend six dayes in descending the space of half a yard.
[58] The settlement of _M_uddy Water, proveth that that Element
hath no aversion to Division.
_Nor let them say, that the seeing of such small Bodies, consume
six dayes in descending so little a way, is a sufficient Argument
of the Waters Resistance of Division; because that is no resisting
of Division, but a retarding of Motion; and it would be simplicity
to say, that a thing opposeth Division[59], and that in the same
instant, it permits it self to be divided: nor doth the Retardation
of Motion at all favour the Adversaries cause, for that they are to
instance in a thing that wholly prohibiteth Motion, and procureth
Rest; it is necessary, therefore, to find out Bodies that stay in
the water, if one would shew its repugnancy to Division, and not
such as move in it, howbeit but slowly._
[59] Water cannot oppose division, and at the same time permit it
self to be divided.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account