A friend of Marie-Antoinette (Lady Atkyns)Barbey, Frédéric
History
A friend of Marie-Antoinette (Lady Atkyns)
Barbey, Frédéric
Atkyns, Charlotte Walpole, Lady, approximately 1758-1836; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799; Louis XVII, of France, 1785-1795
It becomes evident that Peltier and Lady Atkyns, almost abandoning
any hope of saving the King, whose situation appeared to them to
be desperate, now brought all their efforts to bear upon the other
prisoners of the Temple.
“If His Majesty persists in his reluctance to be rescued from prison,
at least we may still save his poor son from the assassins’ knives.
A well-informed man told me, the day before yesterday, when we were
talking of this deplorable business, that people were to be found in
Paris ready, for a little money, to carry off the Dauphin. They would
bring him out of the Temple in a basket, or else disguised in some
way.... I believe that to save the son is to save the father also.
For, after all, this poor child cannot be made the pretext for any
sort of trial, and as the Crown belongs to him by law on his father’s
death, I believe that they would keep the latter alive, if it were
only to checkmate those who would rally round the Dauphin. But, in the
interval, things may have time to alter, and circumstances may at last
bring about a happy change in this disastrous state of things.”
The month of December went by in this painful state of suspense. What
anxiety must have fretted the heart of the poor lady, as she daily
followed in the _Gazette_ the course of the Royal Trial! On New Year’s
Day she had some further words of encouragement from her friend in
London. All was not lost; Louis XVI. could still reckon, even in the
heart of Paris, upon many brave fellows who would not desert him; and
besides, what about the fatal consequences that would follow on the
crime of regicide? The Members of Convention would never dare--never....
Fifteen days later comes another missive; and this time but little hope
is left. The “Little Baron”--this was what they called d’Auerweck--was
not being idle. Peltier had made an opportunity for him of seeing De
Sèze, the King’s counsel.
“This latter ought to know for certain whether the King does or does
not intend to await his sentence or to expose himself to the hazards
of another flight; but there seems to be very little chance of his
consenting to it. Whatever happens” (added Peltier), “your desires
and your efforts, madam, will not be wasted, either for yourself or
for history. I possess, in your correspondence, a monument of courage
and devotion which will endure longer than London Bridge.... A trusty
messenger who starts to-morrow for Paris affords me a means of opening
my mind to De Sèze for the third time.”
But it was too late. On January 15 the nominal appeal upon the
thirty-three questions presented to the Members of Convention had been
commenced; two days later the capital sentence was voted by a majority
of fifty-three.
On January 21, at the hour when the guillotine had just done its work,
the following laconic note reached Ketteringham to say that all was
over:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account