A History of American Literature Since 1870Pattee, Fred Lewis
History
A History of American Literature Since 1870
Pattee, Fred Lewis
American literature -- 19th century -- History and criticism; American literature -- 20th century -- History and criticism
But the personality of Mark Twain no longer can give life to his humor;
the atmosphere in which it first appeared has gone forever; the man
himself is becoming a mere legend, shadowy and more and more distorted;
his humor must be judged now like that of Cervantes and Shakespeare,
apart from author and times. How does it stand the test? Not at all
well. There are the high spirits of the new West in it--that element
has not evaporated--and there is in it a personal touch, a drollery
that was his individual contribution to humor. There was a certain
drawl in his pen as well as in his tongue. It is this alone that saves
much of his humorous work from flatness. Concerning _The Jumping Frog_,
for instance, Haweis asks in true British way, "What, I should like to
know, is the fun of saying that a frog who has been caused to swallow
a quantity of shot cannot jump so high as he could before?" The answer
is that there is no fun save in the way the story is told; in other
words, save in the incomparable drawl of Mark Twain's pen. One can only
illustrate:
The feller ... give it back to Smiley, and says, very
deliberate, "Well, I don't see no pints about that frog that's
any better'n any other frog."
"May be you don't," Smiley says. "May be you understand
frogs, and may be you don't understand 'em; may be you've had
experience, and may be you ain't, only a amature, as it were.
Any ways I've got _my_ opinion, and I'll risk forty dollars
that he can out-jump any frog in Calaveras county."
And the feller studied a minute, and then says, kinder sad
like, "Well, I'm only a stranger here, and I ain't got no frog;
but if I had a frog, I'd bet you!"
Or take this episode from _The Innocents Abroad_ where he tells of his
sensations one night as a boy upon awakening and finding the body of a
murdered man on the floor of his room:
I went away from there. I do not say that I went away in any
sort of a hurry, but I simply went--that is sufficient. I went
out at the window, and I carried the sash along with me. I did
not need the sash, but it was handier to take it than it was
to leave it, and so I took it. I was not scared, but I was
considerably agitated.
All this and the hundreds of pages like it in _The Innocents Abroad_
and _Roughing It_ and the later books is excellent drollery, but had
Mark Twain written nothing else than this he would be as dead now as an
author as even "Doesticks." His drollery is best in the work that lies
nearest to the source of his first inspiration. As the Western days
faded from his memory, his comedy became more and more forced, until it
could reach at last the inane flatness of _Adam's Diary_ and flatter
still, _Eve's Diary_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account