“No doubt the hall, which was of great importance, had its
Promptuaria and pannaria, with its other appropriate offices; but I
see no ground for applying these plural designations to a single
chamber of such extent and character. We find the same terms used
elsewhere in the charter with reference to other parts of the
building, where there is no such chamber on which to bestow them. I
must also suggest that we do not elsewhere find in remains of this
date, buildings of such unbroken extent, magnitude, and continuous
design, for such a purpose. Store-houses and offices there were
attached to every conventual building of like importance, but we
shall find them, I apprehend, always more equally quadrangular, more
confined, and with a regard to convenience which predominates over
the attention paid to style and effect. Here we have a chamber of
vast extent (we have now ascertained its original length to have been
105 feet), in which the design has been kept carefully unbroken by
the details or partitions necessary to offices such as the word
‘Promptuarium’ describes. We see throughout the whole extent great
attention paid to the arrangements, the regularity, and the
ornamentation of the building; and we find the pillars, the capitals,
shafts, and bases, unbroken and uninjured save by the hand of time,
and, notwithstanding the friable nature of the stone, for the most
part as sharp and well defined as they were left by the chisel of the
mason. It appears to me impossible to reconcile all these
particulars with the purposes assigned to the building by Ormerod, or
by Mr. Ashpitel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account