A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
If not every schoolboy, every one with the slightest tincture of
letters, is supposed to be aware that there were two persons of the name
of Schlegel, who are of very great account in German and in European
criticism. Not merely the schoolboy, but the person ordinarily tinged
with letters, may perhaps be excused if he does not know that at
least[41] _four_ of the name and family have claim to rank here—Johann
Elias, his younger brother Johann Adolf, August Wilhelm, and Karl
Wilhelm Friedrich, these two last being sons of Johann Adolf. Of these
the elder pair concern us in this particular place. And of them it will
be most convenient to take Johann Adolf first, not for the sake of his
famous offspring, but because his critical work is the less important.
He took part in the obscure and uninteresting squabble over the Pastoral
school,[42] but his main contribution to our subject is a translation,
with notes and elaborate _Abhandlungen_, of Batteux. In this, published
as early as 1751, and reprinted later,[43] he is still an evidence of
the domination of French, which his more original brother at least
partly rejected. But there are signs and tokens. He is constantly making
respectful suggestions and limitations: “This conclusion is too large,”
“this is true _to a certain extent_,” and so forth.
The _Abhandlungen_ show the German tendency to generalisation and
abstract disquisition:—On the Origin of Arts, the Building up of Taste,
the divisions of Poetry, its foundation in imitation or illusion, its
distinction from History, and from Ornate Prose, &c. Schlegel is very
much cumbered about Kinds, insists that we must try each new kind and
see whether it comes naturally or not. If it does, that is right. The
Wonderful has “a natural right to please us, a right founded in the
constitution of our souls.” The soul demands novelty, &c. But like his
part-master, Gottsched, he is very doubtful about Ariosto and Milton
(Death and Sin are such “_shadowy_ persons”!), and I do not think he
mentions Shakespeare. He has a considerable position in the list of
writers on German versification, a subject which was acquiring much
importance from the set against rhyme, mentioned above.
[Sidenote: _Johann Elias._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account