A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticismSaintsbury, George
History
A history of criticism and literary taste in Europe, from the earliest texts to the present day. Volume 3 (of 3), Modern criticism
Saintsbury, George
Criticism -- History; Literature -- History and criticism; Literature, Medieval
And we find confirmation of this in those of his critical writings which
have not yet been mentioned, as well as illustrations of other critical
characteristics in him. It is curious that Lessing, so sensitive and
receptive to ancient and later modern influences, is almost as proof
against mediæval and (in his own language) early modern as Gottsched
himself. His low estimate of Lyric seems to come partly from the fact
that Aristotle had slighted it, or at least passed it over, partly from
the fact that in relation to Germany he is not thinking of her ballads
and lays, not even of the extravagances of the seventeenth century, but
of the tame Anacreontic of Hagedorn, Gleim, and Company. Even his study
of Shakespeare has not set him right in this respect. It is most curious
to read his contemporary Hurd, a contemporary for whom Lessing had a
just respect, and to remember that Hurd could appreciate not merely both
Aristotle and Shakespeare, but both Horace and Spenser. And there are
few things which bring out more clearly that immense debt to Shakespeare
and Spenser themselves which has been insisted on as due by English
criticism. It was too early for Lessing to have gone back to Gottfried
and Walther;[71] the German Renaissance had nothing (save the ballads,
which he would not have) to offer him.
[Sidenote: _The close of the_ Dramaturgie _and its moral_.]
The greatest places of the _Dramaturgie_ are those at the close of No.
95, and the penultimate passage of all. In the former, after a long
discussion of the Aristotelian commentaries of Hurd and Dacier, he
refashions his master’s famous dictum in other matter, that “accuracy
must not be expected.” He is not, he says, “obliged to solve all the
problems he raises.” His thoughts may seem desultory, or even
contradictory: but it does not matter if they supply others with the
germ of individual thought. He would but scatter “_fermenta
cognitionis_.” In the other, he proceeds still farther, though still
perhaps without a clear idea how far the path itself will lead. Germans,
he says (I shorten somewhat here), had imitated the French because the
French were believed to be your only followers of the ancients. Then
English plays came in, an entirely different style of drama was
revealed, and the Germans concluded that the aim of tragedy could be
fulfilled without the French rules—that the rules were wrong. And then
they went on to object to rules altogether as mere genius-hampering
pedantry. “In short, we had very nearly thrown away in wantonness all
past experience, insisting that the poet shall in every instance
discover the whole art for himself.” Lessing has endeavoured “to arrest
this secondary fermentation,” and that is all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account