A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
To "break ground" for the study of the subject it may be well
in the outset to read chaps. iii and iv of Posada's _Théories
modernes_; Kautsky's "Entstehung der Ehe und Familie," in
_Kosmos_, XII; Friedrichs, "Ursprung des Matriarchats," in
_ZVR._, VIII, in connection with his "Zur Matriarchatsfrage," in
_ZFE._, XX; and especially his "Familienstufen und Eheformen,"
in _ZVR._, X. The literature and the theories are also reviewed
by Bernhöft, "Zur Gesch. des eur. Familienrechts," _ibid._,
VIII; and Schurman gives an interesting summary and criticism in
_Ethical Import of Darwinism_ (New York, 1888).
For the works of Wake, Letourneau, Starcke, Westermarck, and
other antagonists of the horde theory, see BIBLIOGRAPHICAL
NOTE III.]
I. BACHOFEN AND HIS DISCIPLES
In the same year with the _Ancient Law_ appeared a book which
was destined to have an extraordinary influence in giving a new
direction to speculation and research. This was the _Mutterrecht_ of
the Swiss scholar Johann Jacob Bachofen, whose memory is revered by
many followers.[93] The author shows a wide and minute acquaintance
with classic literature and the early myths; but his work is
fantastic and almost wholly devoid of scientific method.[94] The
material is drawn mainly from two sources: the fragmentary notices
of the rules of kinship and the matrimonial customs of various
peoples handed down from ancient writers, supplemented slightly
through similar accounts by modern travelers; and an interpretation
of the supposed symbolism of religious myths, particularly those of
the Greeks.[95] The inferences derived from this second source are
often far-fetched and fanciful in the extreme. Though the general
results of the investigation are summarized in a short introduction,
the argument is so loose, the arrangement so confusing, and the
style so obscure that it is with the utmost difficulty the author's
meaning can be gathered. Nevertheless it is undeniable that he has
created the terminology and developed the essential elements of the
communistic and gynocratic theories even in their leading details.
[93] See, for example, LIPPERT, _Geschichte der
Familie_, 4, 5; KOHLER, in _ZVR._, IV, 266 ff.,
who regards Bachofen as the "Altmeister der ethnologischen
Jurisprudenz;" and GIRAUD-TEULON, _Mariage et la
famille_, 146 ff., _passim_. _Cf._ KAUTSKY, in _Kosmos_,
XII, 348.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account