A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days: Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of Commons from the Stuarts to Queen VictoriaGrego, Joseph
History
A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days: Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of Commons from the Stuarts to Queen Victoria
Grego, Joseph
Great Britain -- Politics and government; Great Britain. Parliament -- Election
As a qualification to serve, it was, as a rule, deemed essential that
the member should be “an individual either bearing office or being
resident in the borough,” and persons residing elsewhere were held
inadmissible; thus:--
“Feb. 1664. Two letters, one from Sir Robert Hitchin, Kt.,
ye other from Sir Henry Spelman, Kt., desiring to be elected
Burgesses for ye next Parliament; forasmuch as ye Statute of ye
1st of Henry 5 (1413) doth appoint that Burgesses should be men
residing and free in ye Borough at ye time of their election,
it is agreed to answer their letter that ye corporation is
minded to chuse according to ye Statute.”
In March, the mayor and recorder were straightway elected burgesses
for the next parliament, and enacted under “June 20. The mayor to
have ten shillings per day for serving in parliament.” This specially
high allowance was possibly due to the extra state which the mayor of
a corporation like King’s Lynn would be expected to support in the
metropolis, to impress the citizens with the consequence and honour of
the borough. The fee speedily dwindled again, and, in 1642, when the
kingdom was in a state of ebullition, during the Long Parliament, a
general prescript appears to have been instituted as to the fees due to
members, and the possible difficulties of collecting them. It is thus
noted:--
“Oct. 15. An order from ye House of Commons to ye Mayor,
Aldermen, and Common Council, to require them to pay to Mr.
Toll and Mr. Percivall, their Burgesses in Parliament, the same
allowance as formerly per day, being 5_s._”
“1643, Jan. 3. In answer to ye above order to ye House of
Commons to acquaint them that heretofore no Parliamentary wages
have been paid before ye Parliament ended, nor then out of
ye town stock, but by ye freemen and inhabitants, saving of
late of mere bounty ye Burgesses were diversely rewarded by ye
representative body. Also ye impossibility of performing ye
said order, there being no town stock, ye revenues not being
sufficient to defray ye necessary charges in common; besides,
extraordinary expenses unavoidably fall upon us daily for ye
safety of this town and ye kingdom.”
The Rump Parliament, 1649, had abolished the House of Peers, but some
of the Upper Chamber became burgesses to parliament, and this secured
admission to the Commons. Lynn Regis came forward hospitably on this
emergency, and the head of the proud house of Salisbury had reason to
feel grateful for the privilege of being sent to parliament at a time
when the order of Peers was abolished through the spontaneous suffrages
of the people.
“Jan. 16, 1649. Ordered that a letter be written to ye Right
Honble. ye Earl of Salsbury, by ye Mayor from this house, to
give him knowledge that this house have granted him ye freedom
of this Burgh, and that the _comonalty_ of this Burgh hath
elected him a Burgess of ye Parliament of England.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account