A history of the American people, Vol. 2 [of 5] : $b Colonies and nationWilson, Woodrow
History
A history of the American people, Vol. 2 [of 5] : $b Colonies and nation
Wilson, Woodrow
United States -- History
The chief _authorities_ for the settlement and early history
of _Georgia_ are Bancroft, Hildreth, and Bryant; Charles
C. Jones’s _History of Georgia_ and _English Colonization
of Georgia_ in the fifth volume of Winsor’s _Narrative and
Critical History of America_; W. E. H. Lecky’s _History
of England in the Eighteenth Century_; Alexander Hewatt’s
_Historical Account of the Rise and Progress of the Colonies
of South Carolina and Georgia_, in Carroll’s _Historical
Collections of South Carolina_; the first and second volumes of
Peter Force’s _Tracts and Other Papers relating to the Colonies
in North America_; and the _Colonial Acts_ of Georgia.
CHAPTER II
THE PARTING OF THE WAYS
No one who marked how the English colonies had grown, and how the French
had lagged in the effectual settlement and mastery of the regions they
had taken, could wonder that in the final struggle for supremacy the
English had won and the French lost everything there was to fight for.
The French had been as long on the continent as the English, and yet they
did not have one-tenth the strength of the English, either in population
or in wealth, when this war came. There were fifty-five thousand white
colonists in Canada, all told; and only twenty-five thousand more in all
the thin line of posts and hamlets which stretched from the St. Lawrence
through the long valley of the Mississippi to the Gulf,—eighty thousand
in all. In the English settlements there were more than a million
colonists (1,160,000), not scattered in separated posts set far apart in
the forested wilderness, but clustered thick in towns and villages, or
in neighborly plantations, where the forest had been cleared away, roads
made, and trade and peace established. The English had been seeking,
not conquest, but comfort and wealth in busy centres and populous
country-sides, where their life now ran as strong and as calm, almost, as
if they were still in the old lands of England itself. The French, on
the contrary, were placed where their government wished them to be; could
hardly be said to have formed independent communities at all; and were
glad if they could so much as eke out a decent subsistence from the soil,
or from food brought by ship from France over sea. The English spread
very slowly, considering how fast they came, and kept in some sort a
solid mass; but the result was that they thoroughly possessed the country
as they went, and made homes, working out a life of their own. The French
merely built frontier posts, the while, on the lakes and rivers, as they
were bidden or guided or exhorted by their governors; took up such land
as was assigned them by royal order; did their daily stint of work, and
expected nothing better. They were, moreover, painfully, perilously
isolated. Ships could come from England to any part of the English coasts
of America in five weeks, whereas it was a good six months’ journey from
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account