A history of the Zulu Rebellion, 1906, and of Dinuzulu's arrest, trial, and expatriationStuart, James
History
A history of the Zulu Rebellion, 1906, and of Dinuzulu's arrest, trial, and expatriation
Stuart, James
Dinuzulu, approximately 1868-1913; Zulu Rebellion, 1906; Zululand (South Africa) -- History
Although the policy of _divide et impera_ has failed to destroy much
of the natural affinity between tribes, there is no doubt it has also
helped to drive others still further apart. The animosities between
many of them are proverbial. The efforts of any Chief at organization
have, moreover, been checked by a provision in the Code which
prescribes penalties for "summoning an armed assembly of his tribe"
or "classing or causing to be classed, the men of his tribe into
companies or regiments," without the permission of the Supreme Chief.
Notwithstanding this, various Chiefs have, for many years, divided
their men into regiments and companies. In some cases, this has been
done innocently by loyal men, in others by men not so loyal. No harm,
however, arose out of the practice until the Insurrection took place,
and even then the Government gained more, perhaps, from loyal Chiefs
who happened to be semi-organized, _e.g._ Sibindi, Mveli, Sitshitshili
and Mfungelwa, than it suffered from those who were openly disloyal,
_e.g._ Bambata and Sigananda.
The Poll Tax Act was, of course, a powerful agent in breaking down the
long-standing differences referred to, whilst the order to kill off
pigs and white fowls further influenced large numbers to unite and
rebel. It was never possible to determine in any satisfactory way how
many were prepared to join those actually in the field, even though
approximate estimates of the latter could always be arrived at. It
is enough, at this stage, to say that about 150 men struck the first
decisive blow and that, although probably 1,000 adherents were gained
at Nkandhla within the next two or three weeks, further accessions
were determined rather by the successes met with than by a feeling
that the methods adopted were the best available for securing the end
in view. As these successes were insignificant, the rebels that joined
did so in small lots at a time. Had the troops met with two or three
reverses, especially at the beginning, it is probable thousands would
have gone over, only to be followed by thousands of others if the
efforts of these again had proved successful.
_Leaders._--Suitable and experienced leaders were wanting; not that
capable men could not be found, but the most capable were the ones who
best realized the difficulties of the undertaking and the poor chances
of success. There is no doubt that many Chiefs espoused the cause
whilst pretending to be personally loyal, and this when many members
of their tribes had deserted to join the rebels.
_Arms and ammunition._--As there was no law forbidding the keeping of
assegais and shields, it may be assumed nearly every Native in the
Colony was fully armed, though many would not have been in possession
of war shields.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account