“I, Athelstan the king, with the counsel of Wulfhelm, archbishop, and of
my other bishops, make known to the reeves at each burgh, and beseech you
in God’s name, and by all His saints, and also by my friendship, that
ye first of my own goods render the tithes both of live stock and of
the year’s earthly fruits, so as they may most rightly be either meted
or told or weighed out; and let the bishops then do the like from their
own goods, and my ealdormen and my reeves the same. And I will that the
bishops and the reeves command it to all those who ought to obey them,
that it be done at the right term. Let us bear in mind how Jacob the
patriarch spake, ‘Decimas et hostias pacificas offeram tibi’; and how
Moses spake in God’s law, ‘Decimas et primitias non turdabis offerre
Domino.’ It is for us to think how awfully it is declared in the books:
if we will not render the tithes to God, that He will take from us the
nine parts when we least expect; and moreover we have the sin in addition
thereto.”[127]
This is unquestionably the first general law in England for the payment
of predial and mixed tithes. I admit, and have stated, that tithes were
paid by Edward’s treaty with Guthrum, and that clause in the treaty
implied that they were paid previously, but there was no public law
recorded like Athelstan’s, which set forth the payment of predial and
mixed tithes.
Now, Lord Selborne states that Athelstan’s ordinance is not in form a
public legislative Act, but merely a royal message addressed to his
reeves, bishops, and ealdormen.[128] Against this opinion, I place the
opinions of Selden, Kemble, Bishop Stubbs, and Dean Prideaux.
(1) Selden says: “King Athelstan, about the year 930, by the advice and
consent of the bishops of the land made a general law for predial and
mixed tithes.”[129]
(2) Kemble says: “It is well known that the earliest legislative
enactment on the subject of tithes in the Anglo-Saxon laws is that of
Athelstan, bearing date in the first quarter of the tenth century.”[130]
Kemble further adds: “The tithes mentioned by Athelstan is the predial
tithe, or that of the increase of the fruits of the earth, and increase
of the young of cattle. The nature of the sanction of tithes is obvious;
it is the old, unjustifiable application of the Jewish practice, which
fraud or ignorance had made general current in Europe.”[131]
(3) Bishop Stubbs says: “The formula by which the co-operation of the
Witenagemót was expressed is definite and distinct. Alfred issues his
code with the counsel and consent of his Witan; Athelstan writes to the
reeves with the counsel of the bishops.”[132]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account