A modern symposiumDickinson, G. Lowes (Goldsworthy Lowes)
Philosophy
A modern symposium
Dickinson, G. Lowes (Goldsworthy Lowes)
Great Britain -- Social conditions; Social problems
"For Democracy--note it well--destroys greatness in every kind, of
intellect, of perception, as well as of character. And especially it
destroys art, that reflection of life without which we cannot be said
to live. For the artist is the rarest, the most choice of men. His
senses, his perception, his intelligence have a natural and inborn
fineness and distinction. He belongs to a class, a very small, a very
exclusive one. And he needs a class to appreciate and support him. No
democracy has ever produced or understood art. The case of Athens is
wrongly adduced; for Athens was an aristocracy under the influence of
an aristocrat at the time the Parthenon was built. At all times Art
has been fostered by patrons, never by the people. How should they
foster it? Instinctively they hate it, as they hate all superiorities.
It was not Florence but the Medici and the Pope that employed
Michelangelo; not Milan but Ludovic the Moor that valued Leonardo. It
was the English nobles that patronized Reynolds and Gainsborough; the
darlings of our middle class are Herkomer and Collier. There have been
poets, it is true, who have been born of the people and loved of them;
and I do not despise poetry of that kind. But it is not the great
thing. The great thing is Sophocles and Virgil, a fine culture wedded
to a rich nature. And such a marriage is not accomplished in the
fields or the market-place. The literature loved by democracy is a
literature like themselves; not literature at all, but journalism,
gross, shrieking, sensational, base. So with the drama, so with
architecture, so with every art. Substitute the mass for the patron,
and you eliminate taste. The artist perishes; the charlatan survives
and flourishes. Only in science have you still an aristocracy. For
the crowd sees that there is profit in science, and lets it go its way.
Because of the accident that it can be applied, it may be
disinterestedly pursued. And democracy hitherto, though impatiently,
endures an ideal aim in the hope of degrading its achievement to its
own uses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account