A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, Vol. I.Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose
Religion
A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, Vol. I.
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose
Bible. New Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
_Xi_ in the Rosetta stone and Herculanean rolls consists of three
parallel straight lines, the middle one being the shortest, as in
modern printed Greek: but all our Biblical manuscripts exhibit
modifications of the small printed ξ, such as must be closely
inspected, but cannot easily be described. In the Cotton Genesis
this _xi_ is narrow and smaller than its fellows, much like an old
English [Symbol: yogh] resting on a horizontal base which curves
downwards: while in late uncials, as B of the Apocalypse, Cod.
Augiensis (l. 13 Scrivener’s _photographed page_), and especially
in Parham 18 (No. 36), the letter and its flourished finial are
continued far below the line. For the rest we must refer to our
facsimile alphabets, &c. The figures in Cod. Frid.-August. (Nos.
2, 11a, ll. 3, 8) look particularly awkward, nor does the shape in
Cod. Rossanensis much differ from these. In Cod. E, the Zurich
Psalter of the seventh century, and Mr. W. White’s fragment Wd,
_xi_ is the common Z with a large horizontal line over it,
strengthened by knobs at each end.
_Omicron_ is unchanged, excepting that in the latest uncials (No.
16, 36) the circle is mostly compressed, like _theta_, into a very
eccentric ellipse.
_Pi_ requires attention. Its original shape was doubtless two
vertical straight lines joined at top by another horizontal,
thinner perhaps but not much shorter than they. Thus we meet with
it on the Rosetta stone, Codd. R, Vatican., Sinaiticus, Ephraemi,
Claromontanus, Laud. of the Acts, the two Pentateuchs, Cureton’s
Homer, and sometimes Cod. A (No. 12). The fine horizontal line is,
however, slightly produced on both sides in such early documents
as the papyri of Hyperides and Herculaneum, and in the Cotton
Genesis, as well as in Cod. A occasionally(33). Both extremities
of this line are fortified by strong points in Codd. N and
Rossanensis, and mostly in Cod. A, but the left side only in Cod.
Z, and this in Cod. Bezae occasionally becomes a sort of hooked
curve. The later oblong _pi_ was usually very plain, with thick
vertical lines and a very fine horizontal, in Arund. 547 (No. 16)
not at all produced; in Harl. 5598 (No. 7) slightly produced on
both sides; in Parham 18 (No. 36) produced only on the right.
_Rho_ is otherwise simple, but in all our authorities except
inscriptions is produced below the line of writing, least perhaps
in the papyri and Cod. Claromont., considerably in Codd. AX (Nos.
12, 38), most in Parham 18 (No. 36): Codd. N, Rossanensis, and
many later copies have the lower extremity boldly _bevelled_. The
form is [Symbol like sans-serif bold Roman capital P] rather than
[Symbol like serif Roman capital P] in Codd. אA. In Cod. D a
horizontal stroke, longer and thicker than in _kappa_, runs to the
left from the bottom of the vertical line.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account