Belgium -- History; World War, 1914-1918 -- Belgium
By this provisional arrangement the Empire was divided into “circles.”
The episcopal duchy of Cambrai, Liège, and the small principality of
Stavelot-Malmedy became a part of the so-called circle of Westphalia;
the Seventeen Provinces of the Netherlands and the Franche-Comté
constituted a new circle, called the “circle of Bourgogne.” These
states were placed under the armed protection of the Empire, which
undertook to defend them as members of the whole. They were recognized,
however, as independent and free states, not subject to the laws of the
Empire. At the same time, fearing that, through the application of the
varying rules of succession existing in each Belgian principality, the
union might some day become imperiled, Charles V, by a special act,
ordained that the Netherlands or Seventeen Provinces should forever be
considered an indivisible whole, in which the first-born son should be
regarded as the heir to the throne. In case of deficiency of a male
heir, however, the female heir was to be recognized in the succession.
This was really a constitutional law sanctioned by the States-General,
officially gathered in solemn meeting in Brussels in 1549. The early
work of the dukes of Burgundy was now completed and firmly established.
Another task of tremendous importance now engaged the attention
of Charles. This was the fight against heresy. The new difficulty
presented an entirely novel problem.
When, by the revolt of Luther against the Roman Catholic church,
Protestantism began rapidly to spread all over Europe, it quickly
found a follower in the Netherlands, whose location facilitated its
expansion. In virtue of their historical development, the Netherlands
are an essentially Catholic state. Charles V and Philip II, as
sovereigns of that state, considered themselves the defenders of
orthodoxy, religious unity, and the union of church and state. In
opposing what they considered to be a political as well as a religious
crime, they invoked the penal laws and criminal institutions as their
weapons against what they regarded as a revolutionary movement.
The famous _placarts_, or penal laws, enacted under Charles V to the
number of a dozen between 1520 and 1530, were complementary to each
other. They were all the work of the government and were approved by
the States-General, the prominent members of the military aristocracy,
and the knights of the Golden Fleece. They were preventive and
repressive at the same time. From a repressive point of view, they
distinguished between the crime of heresy and the simple offense
against the prescriptions of the _placarts_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account