But this master of statecraft, this creator of despotic monarchy, had
one unsatisfied ambition. He would have exchanged all his honors for
the ability to write one play like those of Corneille. Hungering for
literary distinction, he could not have gotten into his own Academy had
he not created it. And jealous of his laurels, he hated Corneille as
much as he did the enemies of France.
The feeble King Louis XIII. manifested wisdom in at least one thing.
He permitted this greatest statesman of his time, and one of the
greatest perhaps of all time, to have a free hand in managing his
kingdom. And whatever the pressure from the queen-mother, from cabals
and intriguing nobles, he never yielded the point, but kept his great
minister in his service as long as they both lived. This was
especially commendable in Louis because they were personally
antagonistic, and also because the queen-mother constantly used her
powerful influence over her son for his downfall.
Marie had been permitted to return to Paris, where her son, perhaps to
console her for the loss of the Concinis, had built for her the Palais
de Luxembourg, intended as a reminiscence of her dear Italy, with its
Medicean architecture and Italian gardens and fountains. Here she held
her little court in great splendor, and here she wove her ineffectual
webs for Richelieu's defeat and downfall. It is said that at one time
Louis at her instigation had actually taken the pen in hand to sign the
order for his minister's disgrace, when that vigilant and omniscient
being, perfectly aware of what was occurring, appeared from behind the
curtains. And Louis, quailing before the superior will of a master,
sent his vicious, intriguing mother into perpetual banishment. And we
are told that Marie, the subject of those immortal canvases now at the
Louvre, was actually sheltered and fed by the great painter at his own
home in the day of her disgrace and poverty.
It is not strange that Peter the Great pronounced Richelieu the model
statesman! Their ideals were the same. The minister intended that
everything in France should lie helpless at the feet of royalty; that
kingship should absorb into itself every source of power. While
Cromwell was tearing down a throne in England and leading a king to a
scaffold, Richelieu, facing every class, current, and force, was making
the throne impregnable in France, and preparing a magnificent
inheritance for the infant Louis XIV., then in his cradle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account