Russia -- History -- Revolution, 1905-1907; Russia -- Politics and government -- 1894-1917; Russia -- Social conditions -- 1801-1917
“There are three parties I could belong to,” said the small landlord;
“the alliance of October 17th, the alliance of Right and Order, and the
Constitutional Democratic Party. I would be willing to support any one
of these three, in the hope that they would lead directly or indirectly
to the disappearance of the present dynasty and to the establishment of
a real autocracy.”
The student laughed. “The Constitutional Democrats will not lead you to
an autocracy of any kind,” he said.
“I am not so sure,” said the landlord. “Napoleon was the child of the
Revolution, and so was Cromwell. I support the Radicals in the same way
in which I would have supported the Puritans to get rid of Charles I.,
and make way for Cromwell.”
“And Charles II.?” asked the professor, who had just returned from a
prolonged stay in England.
“Precisely, and Charles II.,” said the landlord. “The Charles the Firsts
of history are invincibly ignorant, whereas the Charles the Seconds have
learned the lesson and make ideal monarchs. One cannot always be
governed by men of genius, and in the intervening period, when the
genius is absent, I prefer to be governed by a man of the world, such as
Charles II. or Louis XVIII., rather than by demagogues and idealists.”
“It is better to be governed by honest demagogues and idealists than by
dishonest Bureaucrats,” said the student. “The Bureaucrats made the
war.”
“When the war was declared you students marched cheering into the
streets, and I myself happening to be in uniform that day—I am in the
Reserve—was carried in reluctant triumph on the shoulders of an
enthusiastic crowd. The war can be blamed, not because it was immoral,
for it was not more immoral than any other war, but because it was made
too late, and because it was unsuccessful.”
“The war,” said the professor, “was a war made by irresponsible
capitalists, in the same way as the South African War was the work of a
gang of financiers, and had a true Englishman of genius, such as
Gladstone or Bright, been alive, the war would not have been possible.”
“Yes,” said the student, “the feeling here was never so great against
England during this war as during the war in South Africa.”
“The English,” answered the landlord, “made the same mistake as we did;
they knew nothing about South Africa, and made the war later than they
should have done; had they waited longer the Afrikander element would
have probably turned them out of South Africa altogether, and they would
have lost their prestige and their Colonies. Bismarck foresaw this, and
hoped that it might happen.”
“The English have gained nothing by having betrayed their ancient
tradition, and sacrificed to false gods,” said the professor, “but now
they are returning to the true path, and it is to Liberal England that
we must look for example and support.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account