London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
“that whosoever shall not be here at prayers every morning at eight
o’clock shall pay one shilling to the poor.” James I. mentioned as an
especial grievance, that the Commons brought the protestation concerning
their liberties into the House _at six o’clock at night_, _by
candle-light_! “I move,” said Serjeant Wylde, “against sitting in the
afternoon. This council is a grave council and sober, and ought not to
do things in the dark.” Sir A. Haselrigge said he never knew good come
of candles. Sir William Waddington brought in two from the clerk against
the direction of the House, and was committed to the Tower next morning.
Having sat on the occasion till seven, Sir H. Vane complained, “We are
not able to hold out sitting thus in the night.” After the Revolution
matters got worse. Bishop Burnet complains that the House did not meet
till twelve; and in the next generation Speaker Onslow adds, “This is
grown shamefully of late, even to two of the clock.” In the time of Pitt
and Fox the evil reached its climax. The motion for the Speaker leaving
the chair on Fox’s India Bill was put to the vote at half-past four in
the morning. During the Westminster scrutiny the House sometimes sat
till six a.m. Pitt, speaking on the slave-trade, introduced his
beautiful quotation relative to the sun as it was then just bursting on
his audience. Sir Samuel Romilly tells us that he would not unfrequently
go to bed at his usual time, and rising next morning somewhat earlier
than usual would go down to be present at the division. I think it was
during the Reform debates that an hon. M.P., having been present at the
discussion the previous night, and being desirous to secure a good place
the next evening, went down to the House early in the morning for that
special purpose, and found the debate, at the commencement of which he
had been present, and which he thought had long been over, proceeding
hotly and furiously. In the last session of parliament the house sinned
greatly in this respect. I am told this state of things is for the
advantage of the lawyers, who otherwise would not be able to attend in
the House at all; but it may be questioned whether this is such a benefit
as some suppose, and certainly the midnight hour, especially after mind
and body have alike been jaded by the strain of a long debate, is not the
best for passing measures of a legislative character; and yet it is in
the small hours, when members are weary, or, we fear, in some cases
slightly vinous, or indifferent and apathetic, that most of the real
business of the nation is performed. Now against this bad habit for many
years Mr. Brotherton waged an incessant but unsuccessful war. As soon as
ever midnight arrived the hon. gentleman was on his legs, warning
honourable members of its arrival, and of the injury which late hours
must necessarily occasion to their own health, and to the satisfactory
progress of public business. In his attempts Mr. Brotherton then was
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account