London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
“all silent and all d---d,” is as like a party in a parlour in Hackney as
two peas. The beard movement was a failure; so was the great question of
hat reform, and for similar reasons. We still scowl upon a man with a
wide-a-wake, as we should upon a pick-pocket or a cut-throat. A leaden
monotony hangs heavy on us all. Not more does one man or woman differ
from another than does policeman A1 differ from policeman A 999.
Individuality seems gone: independent life no longer exists. Our very
thought and inner life is that of Buggins, who lives next door. The
skill of the tailor has made us all one, and man, as God made him, cuts
but a sorry figure by the side of man as his tailor made him. This is an
undeniable fact: it is not only true but _the_ truth. One motive serves
for every variety of deed—for dancing the polka or marrying a wife—for
wearing white gloves or worshipping the Most High. “At any rate, my
dears,” said a fashionable dame to her daughters when they turned round
to go home, on finding that the crowded state of the church to which they
repaired would not admit of their worshipping according to Act of
Parliament,—“At any rate, my dears, we have done the genteel thing.” By
that mockery to God she had made herself right in the sight of man.
Actually we are all so much alike that not very long since in Madrid a
journeyman tailor was mistaken for a Prince. It is not always that such
extreme cases happen; but the tendency of civilization, as we have it
now, is to work us all up into one common, unmeaning whole—to confound
all the old distinctions by which classes were marked—to mix up the
peasant and the prince, more by bringing down the latter than elevating
the former; and thus we all become unmeaning, and monotonous, and
common-place. The splendid livery in which “Jeames” rejoices may show
that he is footman to a family that dates from the Conquest: it may be
that he is footman to the keeper of the ham and beef shop near London
Bridge. The uninitiated cannot tell the difference. A man says he is a
lord; otherwise we should not take him for one of the nobles of the
earth. A man puts on a black gown, and says he is a religious teacher:
otherwise we should not take him for one who could understand and
enlighten the anxious yearnings of the human heart. The old sublime
faith in God and heaven is gone. We have had none of it since the days
of old Noll: it went out when Charles and his mistresses came in. But
instead, we have a world of propriety and conventionalism. We have a
universal worshipping of Mrs. Grundy. A craven fear sits in the hearts
of all. Men dare not be generous, high-minded, and true. A man dares
not act otherwise than the class by which he is surrounded: he must
conform to their regulations or die; outside the pale there is no hope.
If he would not be as others are, it were better that a millstone were
hung round his neck and that he were cast into the sea. If, as a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account