Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthousesStevenson, Alan
History
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthouses
Stevenson, Alan
Skerryvore Lighthouse (Hebrides, Scotland)
In the Eddystone the radius of the base, at the level of high water
of spring tides, is somewhat less than _one-fifth_ of the height
of the Tower above that level; while in the Bell Rock, at the same
level, it is little more than _one-seventh_ of the height. If, again,
we suppose the curve of the Eddystone to be continued downwards to
the level of low water, the radius (in so far as we may judge from
sketching the continuation of a curve undefined by any geometrical
property) would be rather more than _one-fourth_ of the whole height
above that level; while in the Bell Rock the proportion, in reference
to the same level, is a little more than _one-fifth_. Viewing the
whole height of the Skerryvore Tower above _high water_ of spring
tides as equal to 142 feet, and finding that, in the cases of the
Eddystone and the Bell Rock, the radius of the horizontal section at
that level is respectively _one-fifth_ and _one-seventh_ of the whole
height; and again, viewing the extreme height of the Skerryvore Tower
above _low water_ of spring tides as equal to about 155 feet, and
considering the proportionate radii of the Bell Rock and Eddystone (in
so far as the latter is ascertainable) as respectively _one-fifth_ and
_one-fourth_ of the heights of the top of the masonry above the level
of low water, I finally decided upon giving the Tower at the Skerryvore
such dimensions as would not be widely discordant with these general
proportions. In this view, I determined that the radius of the base
should not exceed 22 feet, on the level of about 4 feet above the high
water mark, where I expected to obtain a solid foundation--a base which
bears to the whole height of the Tower a proportion somewhat _less_
than that of the Bell Rock, which is _one-fifth_. It so happens, that
the diameter adopted is nearly the greatest which the Rock affords;
for, although a glance at the accompanying plan of the Rock at high
water (Plate, No. III.) would lead one to suppose that a more extended
base might have been obtained, I found, after many careful examinations
of the gullies and fissures which intersect it, that some of the
concealed fissures run much farther into the Rock than might at first
be imagined. The adoption of a much larger base, even had it been
otherwise advisable, would therefore have involved some risk of the
external ring of stones of the lowest course giving way by the yielding
of an unsound part of the outer portion of the Rock to the pressure
of the superincumbent mass, and might eventually have led to the
destruction of the Tower.
[Illustration: No. 2.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account