Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthousesStevenson, Alan
History
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthouses
Stevenson, Alan
Skerryvore Lighthouse (Hebrides, Scotland)
the superincumbent mass of the wall above. The two remaining pillars,
derived from the hyperbolic and conchoidal[12] frusta, are nearly
identical in form; and of these two curves I preferred the former,
which gives the most advantageous arrangement of materials, in regard
to stability, of all the four forms. This quality of advantageous
proportion exists in these forms, in the ratio of the numbers in
the last column of the following table:[13] which shews a slight
superiority of the Hyperbolic over any of the other forms.
+------------+------+-----------+--------+---------+-----+----------+
| | | | Volume | Distance| | |
| |Height| Diameter | of | of | | |
| |of the| | | solid |centre of| | Economic |
| | Tower| at | at | Tower | Gravity | |Advantage.|
| | in | Base| Top |in cubic| from | H | G·M. |
|Hypothetical| feet.| in | in | feet. | Base. | - | ------ |
| Towers. | (H.)|feet.|feet.| M. | G. | G | G′·M′. |
+------------+------+-----+-----+--------+---------+-----+----------+
|Hyperbolic, | 120 | 42 | 16 | 62,915 | 41·227 |2·911| 1·00000 |
|Conchoidal, | 120 | 42 | 16 | 62,984 | 41·336 |2·903| 0·99627 |
|Parabolic, | 120 | 42 | 16 | 63,605 | 43·400 |2·765| 0·93963 |
|Logarithmic,| 120 | 42 | 16 | 74,742 | 42·460 |2·826| 0·81608 |
|Conical, | 120 | 42 | 16 | 84,737 | 43·280 |2·773| 0·70725 |
+------------+------+-----+-----+--------+---------+-----+----------+
[12] The solid, in this case, would have been formed by the
revolution of the interior conchoid of Nicomedes about its directrix;
and its co-ordinates were kindly calculated for me by my late revered
preceptor, Dr WALLACE, Professor of Mathematics in the University of
Edinburgh, who employed so many hours of his latter years in labours
of kindness among his friends. This act of the Professor was the
result of a conversation I had with him on the subject. Before I
received his friendly communication, however, I had resolved to adopt
the rectangular hyperbola, whose co-ordinates I had myself determined
with this view some time before; and when I found that the conchoid
and the hyperbola, traced between the two fixed points by means of
the calculated co-ordinates, were so nearly coincident, that it was
difficult to prevent their running into each other, even when drawn
out on a large scale, I determined to adhere to my original purpose
of adopting the latter curve as my guide.
[13] The last column of this table is derived as follows:--Assuming
that the economic advantage of any proposed tower of given height
and diameter at base and top, is _inversely_ as the mass and the
height of the centre of gravity above the base, and denoting these
quantities by M and G respectively, the fraction
1
---
G·M
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account