Poetry -- 20th century -- Periodicals; Short stories -- Periodicals
“The philosopher kindly consented to decide the matter, and
consequently gave the lady in question due study. Ultimately he
announced his decision.
“‘Both sides are right,’ he said. ‘She is the ugliest, stupidest, most
aggressive creature on earth; but masculine indifference and dislike
have thrown such a halo about her that all women see her as beautiful
and charming.’”
During the recital of this tale, a flush had risen on Egeria’s cheek,
and she tapped her foot with growing impatience upon the floor. Barely
had he finished when she cried, explosively:
“I hate men! Your fable proves nothing but the ineffable conceit of
your sex!”
The senator pursued his advantage. “I saw a similar remark in a book I
was reading the other day”--pleasantly. “‘I hate men,’ said one woman
to another; ‘I wish they were all at the bottom of the sea.’
“‘Then,’ replied the woman to whom she spoke, ‘we would all be
purchasing diving bells.’
“But”--hastily, as Egeria half rose--“you really don’t consider women
judges of what constitutes feminine beauty?”
“The only judges. We are not dazzled, hypnotized, by a mere matter of
exquisite coloring, the fugitive glance of too expressive eyes. We
are able to bring a calm, unbiased scrutiny to bear upon it, to fully
analyze it. _We_ do not confuse beauty with charm.”
“Are the two, then, distinct?” he pondered.
“Are they distinct?” repeated Egeria, scornfully. “Are they distinct?
Some one--a man, of course--has said that if Cleopatra had been without
a front tooth the whole history of the world would have been changed;
and Heine, you remember, when asked about Madame de Staël, remarked
that, had Helen looked so, Troy would not have known a siege. Absurd!
The sirens of this world who have swayed men’s hearts and imaginations
have never been dependent on their front teeth or their back hair. If
Cleopatra had lost a whole row, Antony and every other man who knew her
would have insisted that women in the full possession of their molars
were repulsive.”
“Ah!” cried the senator, triumphantly, “your words justify me. Beauty
is some subtle essence of the soul, as I said.”
A faint, malicious sparkle brightened Egeria’s eyes. “Really, now,
would you call the sirens of this world soulful creatures? They were
and are psychologists, intuitive diviners of a man’s moods, capable of
meeting him on every side of his nature; but----”
“Do you mean,” interrupted the senator, his eyes reflecting the sparkle
of hers, “that their dominion over us is through an intellectual
comprehension of our moods?”
“Good heavens, no!” disclaimed Egeria, in shocked tones. “Who said
anything about the intellectual faculties of woman? I hear enough of
them at my club. What I am trying to get at is that beauty without
charm has always received a very frigid appreciation. Men prate of it,
adore it, yawn, and--leave it. Of the two, they infinitely prefer charm
without beauty. Now, senator, what is it you really admire in women?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account