American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
I have helped myself largely to Mr. Cortissoz’s book (for which I
am sure he will not quarrel with me) regarding these educational
happenings of La Farge’s early days, because they point to an unusual
acquaintance with philosophic, literary, and artistic traditions.
La Farge was saturated with them at twenty-two. His education was
extraordinary when compared with his American contemporaries--Inness,
Wyant, Martin, Homer. He had found himself before he was thirty and
knew what he wanted to say and do, whereas Homer at sixty was still
uncertain and groping. Art had come to La Farge almost as a child
learns to talk, that is, unconsciously, without great effort. The
formulas had been largely thought out for him and he had merely to
accept them. With Inness, Wyant, and Martin it was necessary to make
their own formulas, work out their own philosophy, establish their own
premises. And that, too, after they had come to man’s estate. La Farge
had a great advantage over them. He was not only born to art but had it
thrust upon him. With his fine natural endowments of mind and eye it is
not, perhaps, remarkable that he afterward was able to achieve art in a
large way and in more than one department.
But he did not rest content with his early experiences. He took up new
problems and remained a student to his latest day. His mental curiosity
was remarkable. He was always trying to get at the cause or sequence
of things. I remember very well arguing at him one day, with undue
vehemence perhaps, about some question of the hour, and hearing his
quiet answer that it made no difference which of us was right, but that
we should go along together and try to get at the truth. That was his
Gallic cast of mind. He had no wish or care to put the other fellow in
the wrong, and as for disputatious argument, it was not intellectually
good form. In this respect Ruskin had amused and vexed him during his
early years. The great critic was not only wrong in matter but in the
method of presenting it. Fromentin, on the contrary, pleased him much.
The French critic’s mind was of the same order as his own.
La Farge had evidently heard of Japanese art in Paris, for in 1863 he
began collecting Japanese prints, sending directly to Japan for them.
He records that he imported at that time many for himself and his
friend Bancroft. He was interested not only in their linear patterns
but in their color relations, particularly as shown in landscape. He
was painting landscapes at this time and working out-of-doors.
“My programme was to paint from nature a portrait and yet to make
distinctly a work of art which should remain as a type of the sort of
subject I undertook.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account