Mr. Grey’s enchorial deed (A), XXVIII 154 or 143 B. C. (B), XXIX 153 142 (C), XXXV 147 136 Mr. Grey’s Greek Antigraph, or rather the enchorial deed of Paris XXXVI 146 135 Mr. Salt’s enchorial deed XLVII 124 Anastasy’s Greek conveyance XII-IX 106. The registry of Mr. Grey’s first deed is therefore at least 37, and, on the whole, most probably 48 years more ancient, than any other writing with a pen and ink that exists; and it still remains in the most perfect preservation. Mr. Jomard has compared the manuscript of Anastasy, for its importance, to the pillar of Rosetta: but it can in no respect whatever be put in competition with the Antigraph of Mr. Grey. [Illustration: SPECIMEN OF MR. GREY’S ENCHORIAL PAPYRUS.] CHAPTER VI. EXTRACTS FROM DIODORUS AND HERODOTUS; RELATING TO MUMMIES. It is rather as being illustrated by the discovery of Mr. Grey’s Greek papyrus, than as contributing much to its illustration, that I shall here introduce such passages of Diodorus Siculus and of Herodotus, as tend to explain the customs of the Egyptians respecting the honours shown to the dead bodies of their relations. “The inhabitants of this country,” says Diodorus, Book I. § 51, Wess., in the language of Booth, p. 26, “little value the short time of this present life; but put a high esteem upon the name and reputation of a virtuous life after death; and they call the houses of the living, _Inns_, because they stay in them but a little while; but the sepulchres of the dead they call _Everlasting habitations_, because they abide in the graves to infinite generations. Therefore they are not very curious in the building of their houses; but in beautifying their sepulchres they leave nothing undone that [the excess of magnificence can suggest].” § 72. W. “What the Egyptians performed, after the deaths of every one of their kings, clearly evidences the great love they bore to them. For honour done to him that cannot possibly know it, in a grateful return of a former benefit, carries along with it a testimony of sincerity, without the least colour of dissimulation.” Booth, p. 37.